home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback

 

New Special Double Issue on the War Print Edition of CounterPunch Available Exclusively to Subscribers: The US vs. Iraq: the Thirteen Year War; The Sanctions That Killed; Bombing Iraq Every 3 Days Since the Ceasefire of 1991; What Would Gore Have Done?; The Rise of the Neocons; Israel's Proxy War Plan; Why Did It End So Quickly?; The Coming Occupation; Re-educating Iraqis, American-style; Those Reconstruction Contracts; Media Hawks; Christian Crusaders; Democratic Candidates and the War; Smart Bombs Go Haywire; Inside the Mind of Santorum; Gore Vidal on John Kerry; Thomas Pickering: the Bad Seed. Remember, the CounterPunch website is supported exclusively by subscribers to our newsletter. Our worldwide web audience is soaring, with more than 60,000 visitors a day. This is inspiring news, but the work involved also compels us to remind you more urgently than ever to subscribe and/or make a (tax deductible) donation if you can afford it. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Recent Stories

May 12, 2003

Chris Floyd
Bush, Bin Laden, Bechtel, and Baghdad

Dave Lindorff
America's Dirty Bombs

Sam Hamod and Elaine Cassel
Resisting the Bush Administration's War on Liberty

Uzi Benziman
Sharon and Sons, Inc.

Jason Leopold
The Decline and Fall of Thomas White

Rich Procter
George Jumps the Shark

Federico Moscogiuri
Going to Israel? Sign or Else

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/12

Book of the Day
Fooling Marty Peretz

Website of the Day
T-Shirts to Protest In

 

May 10 / 11, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
Rosenthal Faces the Music in Key Med Marijuana Case

JoAnn Wypijewski
Labor in the Dawn of Empire

Annie C. Higgins
The Last Time I Saw Mus'ab

Ron Jacobs
The Devil in New England

William Mandel
One on One with Sen. Joe McCarthy

Jason Leopold
Halliburton Still Flouts the Law as It Profits from Terror

Patrick Cockburn
The Iraqi Quagmire

Larry Magnuson
William Bennett: Next Viceroy of Iraq?

Sasan Fayazmanesh
The Good Terrorists?

Anthony Gancarski
Chalabi: Drowning in Ba'ath-water?

Steven Sherman
A Letter to My European Friends

Khaled El-Bizri
Mr. Bush Comes to Santa Clara

Bruce Jackson
How Fear Curdles the Soul

Adam Engel
Flag in the Rain

Poets Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Hamod & Albert

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/10

Website of the Weekend
Killing Again

 

May 9, 2003

Rahul Mahajan
Don't Lift the Sanctions Yet

Wayne Madsen
When Lying Pays Off: Neo-Con Fabricators

Chris Floyd
The Karamazov Question

Don Monkerud
The Great Christian Schism: War or Peace?

Sam Hamod and Elaine Cassel
Drunk on Power: Bush, Power and the Pathology of the Dry Drunk

Hammond Guthrie
Bombastic Promise Keeping

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/09

 

May 8, 2003

Julie Hilden
When It's a Crime to Visit Your Son

Mickey Z.
Partisan Protests?

Mark Zepezauer
Evil is as Evil Does

David Lindorff
The Coming Senior Revolution

Abu Spinoza
The Detention of Dr. Huda Ammash

Ben Tripp
The Other "F" Word

Norman Madarasz
God in the Service of the Security State: a Dispatch from Brazil

Stew Albert
Pushovers

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/08

Website of the Day
Department of Sexual Security

 

May 7, 2003

Alexander Cockburn
Quoting Under the Influence: Breasts, Martinis, Hitchens

David Krieger
Winning the War; Alienating the World

Sen. Robert Byrd
Bush's Troubling Speech

Bruce Jackson
Bill Kunstler's Last Big Speech

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/07

Website of the Day
The Truth About Bush's Military Records

 

May 6, 2003

Paul de Rooij
An Activist in the Trenches: an Interview with Gretta Duisenberg

Anthony Gancarski
Money to Burn: in Defense of Bill Bennett

John Stanton
Bush's War on Jesus

Sam Hamod
W. Bush: the Little Snot, the Little Bully

Robert Fisk
Bush Says the War is Over: Tell It to the Shi'a

Kathleen Christison
A Roadmap to Nowhere

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/06

 

May 5, 2003

Gary Leupp
Phase Two: Syria and Iran

Jorge Mariscal
The Militarization of US Culture

Ishmael Reed
A Family Values Man

Tarif Abboushi
Sharon's Confidence: Bush Won't Come to Shove on Roadmap

Leila Matsui
Regime Change Begins at Home...Literally

Steve Perry
Bush's Wars

Sam Smith
Coalition of the Shilling

 

May 3, 2003

Ron Jacobs
Tears of Rage: Remembering May 1970

Elaine Cassel
William Bennett, a Freudian Perspective

Sam Hamod
Understanding the Shi'a of Lebanon

Scott Fleming
Getting Shot on the Oakland Docks

Mickey Z.
Cuba and Puerto Rico: 100 Years of Terror

William S. Lind
Don't Take Col. John Boyd's Name in Vain

Dr. Bruce Blair
The New Nuclear Terrorism Threat

Joanne Mariner
Cluster Bombs Over Iraq

Anthony Gancarski
Hot Fun in the Summertime

Ilian Pappe
Searching Jenin

William MacDougall
America's Kids Are All Right: Pre-Teen Conservative Commentators

Seth Sandronsky
Incarcerated and Invisible

Rich Procter
Over Our Dead Bodies

Lenni Brenner
How Bob Dylan Found His Voice

Adam Engel
American Bulk

Poets' Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Albert

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/03

 

May 2, 2003

Caoimhe Butterly
Crowd Control American-style

Neve Gordon
US: No Right to Know About the Disappeared

John Chuckman
Tom Friedman's Life as a Pet Hamster

Bradley Burston
Betting on Abu-Mazen...To Lose

Harvey Wasserman
Bush's Military Defeat

John Troyer
Question Those Writing History

Saul Landau
The Cuba Conundrum

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/02

Website of the Day
Moussaoui's Quiz

 

May 1, 2003

Jeffrey St. Clair
Santorum: That's Latin for Asshole

Iain Boal
A May Day Message to the FCC: "We Are Many; They are Few"

Diana Johnstone
About Cuba

Sam Hamod
Killings at Al Fallujah, City of Mosques

Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
Intelligence Fiasco

Lee Sustar
Greed Air: Airline Workers Agree to Pay Cuts, While Bosses Stuff Their Pockets

Peter Linebaugh
May Day at Kut and Kienthal

Stew Albert
Straight Shooters

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/01

Website of the Day
South Bay Mobilization

 

April 30, 2003

Ashley Smith
Under Uncle Sam's Thumb: a History of Washington's Occupations

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 4/30

Gary Leupp
Shooting Schoolboys: Preliminary Thoughts on the Fallujah Massacre

Robert Jensen
Fighting Alienation in the USA

Wayne Madsen
The Four Horsemen of Propaganda

Ahmad Faruqui
Bush's Strategic Myopia About the Middle East

Gabriel Kolko
Iraq, the US and the End of the European Coalition

Adolfo Perez Esquivel
A Nobel Laureat's Letter to Bush: "You Talk of Freedom; You Detest Freedom"

 

April 29, 2003

Gary Leupp
Disorder and Opportunity: the Results of the Iraq War

Uri Avnery
Don't Envy Abu-Mazen

Anthony Gancarski
Brush with the Law

Mickey Z.
POWs: Then and Now

CounterPunch Wire
How to Spin Israel on the Hill: Internal Lobbying Documents

Robert Fisk
Did the US Murder Journalists?

Chris Floyd
Bush Telegraphs His Punches on Syria

Wayne Madsen
About Those Iraqi Intelligence Documents

Wallace Gagne
Pilgrimage or Demolition Derby?

Eliot Katz
Playing Catch with Cracked Globes

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 4/29

 

 

Hot Stories

Elaine Cassel
Civil Liberties Watch

Michel Guerrin
Embedded Photographer Says: "I Saw Marines Kill Civilians"

Uzma Aslam Khan
The Unbearably Grim Aftermath of War: What America Says Does Not Go

Paul de Rooij
Arrogant Propaganda

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

May 13, 2003

My Meeting with Arafat

"Isn't He Irrelevant? Finished?"

By URI AVNERY

"Have you gone mad? Now? He is irrelevant! He's finished!" These were the reactions of some people when Israeli TV showed my meeting with Arafat in Ramallah this week.

Is Arafat "finished"? If so, he has not heard about it. I found him in splendid shape. At some of my meetings with him over the last few years he frequently looked tired, even distant and self-absorbed. This time he was in good spirits. He talked energetically, reacted rapidly, poked gentle fun at his assistants and made some biting remarks.

(For example: when we spoke about Sharon's demand that Abu-Mazen conduct mass arrests, he laughed: "But the Israelis have destroyed all our prisons, except the one in Jericho. And if we want to transfer a criminal there, we must ask the Quartet for a car, so as to be able to pass the Israeli checkpoints!")

One can understand his lively mood. For the last year, his life has been hanging on a thread. Sharon could have sent his men to kill him at any moment. (Several times this danger seemed so close that my friends and I found it necessary to rush there as a human shield.) One of the Israeli officers boasted this week that "only a thin wall separated me from him." Now this danger has been rendered more remote --even if Arafat is still confined to his small building, amid surrealistic ruins.

During the last 45 years, his life has been in danger many times. Dozens of attempts have been made on his life. Once his airplane crash landed, killing several of his entourage. He survived it all. This time, too. His sense of relief is understandable.

There is also physical relief. Since he returned to Palestine, his workload has been incredible. As he insisted on attending to practically everything himself, big things and small, he worked inhuman hours, often until the early hours of the morning. Now he is free of a substantial part of the routine work, and the results are obvious.

But the main thing is that Arafat's standing with his own people is now stronger than ever. Curiously enough, it is the appointment of a Prime Minister that has caused this. The appointment of Abu-Mazen, which was intended by Sharon and Bush to "weaken" Arafat and to "push him aside", has had the opposite effect.

This requires an explanation. For years now, a continuous and concentrated campaign to demonize Arafat has been conducted in Israel and the West. In the ten years since Oslo, millions of words have been spoken and written about him in the Israeli media, and I don't recall one single word of praise. He has been systematically described as a terrorist, tyrant, dictator, corrupt liar, a cheat and what not. In particular he was represented as the man who said "no" to the unprecedentedly generous offers of Ehud Barak and President Clinton, which "proves" that in reality his aim is to destroy Israel.

Those who have been fed with this propaganda cannot understand why Palestinians adore him. The answer is: for the very same reasons.

In the eyes of the Palestinians --almost all of them --Arafat is a fearless leader, who stands firm in the most difficult circumstances; a man who has the guts to say "no" to the demands of the mighty of the world to betray fundamental rights of the Palestinian people. He has confronted the rulers of the Arab world without flinching; at Camp David he stood up to immense pressure from Clinton and Barak without yielding; he held out in the terrible conditions of the siege of his Ramallah compound without breaking.

Palestinians, like all Arabs, like all peoples, admire personal courage. Arafat has proven his courage in conditions that no other leader in the world has had to face. He has come to symbolize the steadfastness of the whole Palestinian people. That is the source of his authority, even in the eyes of his many critics on the right and on the left.

This authority is essential for Abu-Mazen's political effectiveness. Unlike Arafat, Abu-Mazen is popular in the West. He radiates moderation and readiness for compromise. This is the face the West wants to see. The two of them are a bit like Ben-Gurion and Sharett in the early days of Israel. Ben-Gurion was the idol of the Israeli public, while Sharett was popular on the international stage.

Abu-Mazen is accepted by the Palestinian public. If another person had assumed office under such circumstances, he would have been suspected of being a collaborator. But Abu-Mazen is known as a Palestinian patriot, and is respected as one of the founders of the Fatah movement. Even in extreme demonstrations, I did not hear shouts of protest against him. However, he is not a charismatic leader and has no solid political base.

That is why Abu-Mazen needs Arafat. Without his solid backing, Abu-Mazen will neither be able to make concessions abroad nor to act forcefully at home. More than ever, Arafat is essential for progress on the road to peace.

But does Arafat really want peace? Most Israelis are unable to imagine such a thing. How could they? Did they ever hear the true story?

From my personal experience, I can recount this: At the end of the October 1973 war, Arafat concluded that if the armies of Egypt and Syria were defeated after their unexpected brilliant initial successes, then there is no military solution to the conflict. As usual, he decided quickly and decided alone. He instructed his trusted aide, Sa'id Hamami, to publish an article in London calling for the attainment of a peace settlement with Israel by political means. (This induced me to meet with Hamami in secret, and since then I have followed Arafat's moves closely.)

For the Palestinian national movement, the proposed change was redical. A political process instead of the sole reliance on "armed struggle". A peace settlement with Israel, which had taken possession of 78% of the Palestinian land and expelled half of the Palestinian people from their homes. That necessitated a mental and political revolution, and since 1974 Arafat has promoted this revolution cautiously and with determination, step by step. (I witnessed these steps - first through Hamami and Issam Sartawi, later in personal contact with Arafat.) in 1988 the Palestinian National Council at long last adopted this line explicitly, after a series of ambivalent resolutions. Abu-Mazen was closely connected with this process right from the beginning.

Throughout this period, Yitzhaq Rabin and Shimon Peres actively opposed this development. (On this, too, I can bear personal witness, since I conveyed several messages from Arafat to Rabin.) It must be stated clearly for history's sake: Not Rabin and Peres were the spiritual fathers of Oslo, but Arafat and Abu-Mazen. The award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Peres and not to Abu-Mazen was, therefore, a gross injustice.

Sharon, of course, does not want peace that brings with it a viable Palestinian state in all the occupied territories and the evacuation of the settlements. But he is far too shrewd to openly obstruct Abu-Mazen, the protegee of the West. Therefore he is concentrating all his efforts on breaking Arafat --knowing that without Arafat, Abu-Mazen would be ineffective.

That is the crux of the matter. Arafat is essential for the peace effort. That's why I went to visit him.

Uri Avnery is an Israeli writer and peace activist with Gush Shalom. He is one of the writers featured in The Other Israel: Voices of Dissent and Refusal. He can be reached at: avnery@counterpunch.org.

 

Yesterday's Features

Alexander Cockburn
Rosenthal Faces the Music in Key Med Marijuana Case

JoAnn Wypijewski
Labor in the Dawn of Empire

Annie C. Higgins
The Last Time I Saw Mus'ab

Ron Jacobs
The Devil in New England

William Mandel
One on One with Sen. Joe McCarthy

Jason Leopold
Halliburton Still Flouts the Law as It Profits from Terror

Patrick Cockburn
The Iraqi Quagmire

Larry Magnuson
William Bennett: Next Viceroy of Iraq?

Sasan Fayazmanesh
The Good Terrorists?

Anthony Gancarski
Chalabi: Drowning in Ba'ath-water?

Steven Sherman
A Letter to My European Friends

Khaled El-Bizri
Mr. Bush Comes to Santa Clara

Bruce Jackson
How Fear Curdles the Soul

Adam Engel
Flag in the Rain

Poets Basement
Reiss, Guthrie, Hamod & Albert

Steve Perry
Bush's War Web Log 5/10

Website of the Weekend
T-Shirts to Protest In

 

Keep CounterPunch Alive:
Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /