What
You're Missing in Our Subscriber-only CounterPunch Newsletter
A Just Settlement
for the Middle East
Our new CounterPunch newsletter,
just out, offers Michael Neumann's plan for a just settlement
in the Middle East. Manuel
Garcia concludes his widely applauded primer on the laws of physics
and the myths of conspiracists by explainging the not-so-mysterious
collapse of WTC 7. But
remember, we are funded solely by the subscribers to the
print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this website by buying a
subscription to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you
won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation towards the
cost of this online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible.Click
here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please:Subscribe
Now
During the first Lebanon war, I visited
Jounieh, a town some 20 km north of Beirut. At the time, it served
as a port for the Christian forces. It was an exciting evening.
In spite of the war raging
in nearby Beirut, Jounieh was full of life. The Christian elite
spent the day in the sun-drenched marina, the women lounging
in bikinis, the men slugging whisky. The three of us (myself
and two young women from my editorial staff--a correspondent
and a photographer) were the only Israelis in town, and so we
were feted. Everybody invited us onto their yachts, and one rich
couple insisted that we come to their home as guests of a family
celebration.
It was indeed something special.
The dozens of family members belonged to the cream of the elite--rich
merchants, a well-known painter, several university professors.
The drinks flowed like water, the conversation flowed in several
languages.
Around midnight, everybody
was slightly drunk. The men got me into a "political"
conversation. They knew that I was an Israeli, but had no idea
about my views.
"Why don't you go into
West Beirut?" one portly gentleman asked me. West Beirut
was held by Arafat's PLO forces, who were defending hundreds
of thousands of Sunni inhabitants.
"Why? What for?"
I queried.
"What do you mean? To
kill them! To kill everybody!"
"Everybody? Women and
children, too?"
"Of course! All of them!"
For a moment, I thought that
he was joking. But the faces of the men around him told me that
he was deadly serious and that everybody agreed with him.
At that moment I grasped that
this beautiful country, rich in history, blessed with all the
pleasure of life, is sick. Very, very sick.
The next day I indeed went
into West Beirut, but for another purpose altogether. I crossed
the lines to meet with Yasser Arafat.
(By the way, at the end of
the party in Jounieh my hosts gave me a parting present: a big
packet of hashish. On the morrow, on my way back to Israel, after
Arafat had made our meeting public, I heard over the radio that
four ministers were demanding that I should be put on trial for
treason. I remembered the hashish and it went sailing out of
the car window.)
* *
*
I AM reminded of that conversation
in Jounieh every time something happens in Lebanon. This week,
for example.
Much nonsense is being spoken
and written about that country, as if it were a country like
any other. George W. Bush talks about "Lebanese democracy"
as if there were such a thing, others speak about the "parliamentary
majority" and "minority factions"' about the need
for "national unity" to uphold "national independence",
as if they were talking about the Netherlands or Finland. All
these have no connection with Lebanese reality.
Geographically, Lebanon is
a torn country, and there lies a part of the secret of its beauty.
Snow-covered mountain chains, green valleys, picturesque villages,
beautiful sea-shore. But Lebanon is also torn socially. The two
schisms are inter-connected: in the course of history, persecuted
minorities from all over the region sought refuge between its
mountains, where they could defend themselves.
The result: a large number
of big and small communities, ready to spring to arms at any
moment. At best, Lebanon is a loose federation of mutually suspicious
communities, at worst a battlefield of feuding groups which hate
each other's guts. The annals of Lebanon are full of civil wars
and horrible massacres. Many times, this or that community called
in foreign enemies to assist it against its neighbors.
Between the communities, there
are no permanent alliances. One day, communities A and B get
together to fight community C. The next day, B and C fight against
A. Moreover, there are sub-communities, which more than once
have been known to make an alliance with an opposing community
against their own.
Altogether, a fascinating mosaic,
but also a very dangerous one--the more so since every community
keeps a private army, equipped with the best of weapons. The
official Lebanese army, composed of men from all communities,
is unable to carry out any meaningful mission.
What is a Lebanese "community"?
On the face of it, it's all about religion. But not only religion.
The community is also an ethnic tribe, with some national attributes.
A Jew will easily understand this, since the Jews are also such
a community, even if spread around the world. But for an ordinary
European or American, it is difficult to understand this structure.
It is easier to think about a "Lebanese nation"--a
nation that exists only in the imagination or as a vision of
the future.
The loyalty to the community
comes before any other loyalty--and certainly before any loyalty
to Lebanon. When the rights of a community or sub-community are
menaced, its members rise up as one in order to destroy those
who are threatening them.
* *
*
THE MAIN communities are the
Christian, the Sunni-Muslim, the Shiite-Muslim and the Druze
(who, as far as religion goes, are a kind of extreme Shiites.)
The Christians are divided into several sub-communities, the
most important of which are the Maronites (named after a saint
who lived some 1600 years ago.) The Sunnis were brought to Lebanon
by the (Sunni) Ottoman rulers to strengthen their hold, and were
mainly settled in the large port cities. The Druze came to find
refuge in the mountains. The Shiites, whose importance has risen
over the last few decades, were for many centuries a poor and
down-trodden community, a doormat for all the others.
As in almost all Arab societies,
the Hamula (extended family) plays a vital role in all communities.
Loyalty to the Hamula precedes even loyalty to the community,
according to the ancient Arab saying: "With my cousin against
the foreigner, with my brother against my cousin." Almost
all Lebanese leaders are chiefs of the great families.
* *
*
TO GIVE some idea of the Lebanese
tangle, a few recent examples: in the civil war that broke out
in 1975, Pierre Gemayel, the chief of a Maronite family, called
upon the Syrians to invade Lebanon in order to help him against
his Sunni neighbors, who were about to attack his territory.
His grandson by the same name, who was murdered this week, was
a member of a coalition whose aim is to liquidate Syrian influence
in Lebanon. The Sunnis, who were fighting against the Syrians
and the Christians, are now the allies of the Christians against
the Syrians.
The Gemayel family was the
main ally of Ariel Sharon, when he invaded Lebanon in 1982. The
common aim was to drive out the (mainly Sunni) Palestinians.
For that purpose, Gemayel's men carried out the horrendous massacre
of Sabra and Shatila, after the assassination of Bashir Gemayel,
the uncle of the man who was murdered this week. The massacre
was overseen by Elie Hobeika from the roof of the headquarters
of the Israeli general Amos Yaron. Afterwards, Hobeika became
a minister under Syrian auspices. Another person responsible
for the slaughter was Samir Geagea, the only one who was put
on trial in a Lebanese court. He was condemned to several life
prison terms and later pardoned. This week he was one of the
main speakers at the funeral of Pierre Gemayel the grandson.
In 1982, the Shiites welcomed
the invading Israeli army with flowers, rice and candy. A few
months later they started a guerilla war against them, which
lasted for 18 years, in the course of which Hizbullah became
a major force in Lebanon.
One of the leading Maronites
in the fight against the Syrians was General Michel Aoun, who
was elected president by the Maronites and later driven out.
Now he is an ally of Hizbullah, the main supporter of Syria.
All this resembles Italy at
the time of the Renaissance or Germany during the 30-Years War.
But in Lebanon this is the present and the foreseeable future.
In such a reality, using the
term "democracy" is, of course, a joke. By agreement,
the government of the country is divided between the communities.
The president is always a Maronite, the prime minister a Sunni,
the speaker of the parliament a Shiite. The same applies to all
positions in the country, at all levels: a member of a community
cannot aspire to a position suited to his talents if it "belongs"
to another community. Almost all citizens vote according to family
affiliation. A Druze voter, for example, has no chance of overthrowing
Walid Jumblat, whose family has ruled the Druze community for
500 years at least (and whose father was murdered by the Syrians.)
He doles out all the jobs "belonging" to his community.
The Lebanese parliament is
a senate of community chiefs, who divide the spoils between them.
The "democratic coalition" which was put in power by
the Americans after the murder of the Sunni Prime Minister Rafik
Hariri, is a temporary alliance of the Maronite, Sunni and Druze
chiefs. The "opposition", which enjoys Syrian patronage,
is composed of the Shiites and one Maronite faction. The wheel
can turn at a moment's notice, when other alliances are formed.
Hizbullah, which appears to
Israelis as an extension of Iran and Syria, is first of all a
Shiite movement that strives to obtain for its community a larger
part of the Lebanese pie, as indeed is its due in accordance
with its size. Hassan Nasrallah--who is also the scion of an
important family--has his eyes on the government in Beirut, not
on the mosques in Jerusalem.
* *
*
WHAT DOES all this say about
the present situation?
For decades now, Israel has
been stirring the Lebanese pot. In the past, it supported the
Gemayel family but was bitterly disappointed: the family's "Phalanges"
(the name was taken from Fascist Spain, which was greatly admired
by grandfather Pierre), were revealed in the 1982 war as a gang
of thugs without military value. But the Israeli involvement
in Lebanon continues to this day. The aim is to eliminate Hizbullah,
remove the Syrians and threaten nearby Damascus. All these tasks
are hopeless.
Some history: in the 30s, when
the Maronites were the leading force in Lebanon, the Maronite
Patriarch expressed open sympathy for the Zionist enterprise.
At that time, many young people from Tel-Aviv and Haifa studied
at the American University of Beirut, and rich Jewish people
from Palestine spent their holidays at Lebanese resorts. Once,
before the founding of Israel, I crossed the Lebanese border
by mistake and a Lebanese Gendarme politely showed me the way
back.
During the first years of Israel,
the Lebanese border was our only peaceful one. Those days there
was a saying: "Lebanon will be the second Arab country to
make peace with Israel. It will not dare to be the first".
Only in 1970, when King Hussein drove the PLO from Jordan into
Lebanon, with the active help of Israel, did this border heat
up. Now even Fuad Siniora, the prime minister appointed by the
Americans, feels compelled to declare that "Lebanon will
be the last Arab state to make peace with Israel!"
All efforts to remove Syrian
influence from Lebanon are bound to fail. In order to understand
this, it is enough to look at the map. Historically, Lebanon
is a part of the land of Syria ("Sham" in Arabic).
The Syrians have never resigned themselves to the fact that the
French colonial regime tore Lebanon from their land.
The conclusions: First, let's
not get stuck in the Lebanese mess again. As experience has shown,
we shall always come out the losers. Second, in order to have
peace on our northern border, all the potential enemies, and
first of all Syria, must be involved.
Meaning: we must give back
the Golan Heights.
The Bush administration forbids
our government to talk with the Syrians. They want to talk with
them themselves, when the time comes. Quite possibly, they will
then sell them the Golan in return for Syrian help in Iraq. If
so, should we not hurry and "sell" them the Golan (which
belongs to them anyhow) for a better price for ourselves?
Lately, voices have been heard,
even of senior army people, that hint at this possibility. It
should be said loudly and clearly: Because of a few thousands
of settlers and the politicians who do not dare to confront them,
we are liable to be dragged into more superfluous wars and to
endanger the population of Israel.
This is the third conclusion:
There is only one way to win a war in Lebanon--and that is to
avoid it.
CounterPunch
Speakers Bureau Sick of sit-on-the-Fence speakers, tongue-tied and timid?
CounterPunch Editors Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St Clair
are available to speak forcefully on ALL the burning issues,
as are other CounterPunchers seasoned in stump oratory. Call
CounterPunch Speakers Bureau, 1-800-840-3683. Or email beckyg@counterpunch.org.
