home / subscribe / donate / about us / books / archives / search / links / feedback / events

 

New Edition of CounterPunch

Baghdad Diary: Going from Bad to Worse by Patrick Cockburn; Kerry in Vietnam: Part two; Silver Star or Simply Murder? by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair; Is Your Child's Teacher Working for the Pentagon? by Jorge Mariscal. In March, CounterPunch Online was read by 15.4 million viewers--by far our biggest month ever. But remember, we are funded solely by the subscribers to the print edition of CounterPunch. Please support this website by buying a subscription to our newsletter, which contains fresh material you won't find anywhere else, or by making a donation for the online edition. Remember contributions are tax-deductible. Click here to make a (tax deductible) donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now!

Or Call Toll Free 1-800-840 3683 or write CounterPunch, PO BOX 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

St. Clair in the Heartland

CounterPunch's Scorching New History of a Decade of War
Order Now / Available in April

 

Today's Stories

April 10 / 12, 2004

Tariq Ali
Iraqi Resistance: a New Phase

April 9, 2004

Robert Fisk
This War's Simple Truth: Iraqis Do Not Want Us

John L. Hess
The Non-Confessions of a Warrior Princess: Condi on the Stand

Niranjan Ramakrishnan
Condoleezza's Condescensions

Christopher Brauchli
Holes in the Sky: Bush's Crazed Missile Defense Plan

Don Santina
Forget the Alamo!: Glorifying the Fight for Slavery in Texas

William S. Lind
The 4G Warfare Seminar, Cont.

Bill Christison
9/11 Commission is Bush's New Lapdog

Website of the Day
What We've Done to Fallujah


April 8, 2004

Wayne Madsen
Rice (and the Record) Proves It: Bush Knew, But Failed to Act

Kurt Nimmo
Will Bush Flatten Fallajuh?

Patrick Cockburn
Guided Missile; Misguided War

Laura Flanders
Steamed Rice

Larry Everest
What Condi Rice is Hiding

Adam Federman
Sacred Capitalism Hits Russia

M. Junaid Alam
The Iraqi Intifada Begins

Norman Solomon
The Quest for a Monopoly on Violence

Douglas Valentine
Echoes of Vietnam: Phoenix, Assassination and Blowback in Iraq

Website of the Day
Xispas: Chicano Art, Culture and Politics

 

April 7, 2004

Alexander Cockburn
Those Pulitzers!

Sen. Robert Byrd
Deeper into the Mouth of Hell: We Must Find the Exit from Iraq

Ron Jacobs
Tet in Iraq: Closer to the Cosmic Disaster?

Patrick Cockburn
Battles Across Iraq: US Death Toll Mounts

Kathy Kelly
Pacification: Worth the Price?

Sonali Kolhatkar
What Are You Doing About Afghanistan?

Rahul Mahajan
Report from Baghdad: Opening the Gates of Hell

Robert Fisk
US Airlifts Saddam to Qatar

Mike Whitney
America Out of Iraq, Now!

Sam Hamod
Bush, Pandora's Box and the Tiger


April 6, 2004

C.G. Estabrook
Mercenaries and Occupiers

William Blum
The Anti-Empire Report: the Israel Lobby

Col. Dan Smith
The Language of Disbelief: 1.3 Billion Still Live in War Zones

Dr. Bulent Gokay
The Coming Islamic Republic of Iraq?

Lynn Landes
Faking Democracy: Americans Don't Vote; Machines Do

Sheila Samples
What Would Royko Write?

Jason Leopold
Condi's Blind Spot: Rice Never Mentioned al-Qaeda

Mickey Z.
A Reality Show with No End in Sight

Robert Fisk
Iraq on the Brink of Anarchy

 

April 5, 2004

John Farrell
Lessons from El Salvador and Iraq

Robert Fisk
Bloodbath a Bad Omen for Bush

Gary Leupp
Shiites Say No: Another "Nightmare Scenario"

 

April 3 / 4, 2004

Alexander Cockburn
Anti-Depressants a Problem? We're Shocked

Jeffrey St. Clair
How Neil Bush Succeeded in Business Without Really Trying

Gary Leupp
On Jefferson, Diderot and the Political Uses of God

Lawrence Davidson
Orwell and Kafka in Israel / Palestine

Frederick B. Hudson
Condi Rice: the Family Retainer

Phillip Cryan
The Magic of Coca-Cola: Colombian Workers, Civil Rights and Advertising

Dave Zirin
Lester Speaks: an Interview with Lester "Red" Rodney

Ben Tripp
Talking Dirty: Obscene But Not Heard

Bruce Anderson
Phony Liberals and Fake Concern for the Homeless

Bill Fletcher, Jr.
Justice and Legitimacy in Haiti

Mark Scaramella
Do You Have What It Takes to Be Sec. of Defense? Take the Rumsfeld Quiz

Sharon Smith
Do Most Iraqis Really Want the US to Stay?

Rick Giombetti
Melissa Ann Rowland: a Witch for Our Time

Nader/Kerry Quandary

Stephen Gowans
Communists for Capitalism?

Frank Bardacke / Doug Lummis
Support Nader; Dump Bush: an Election Manifesto

Mickey Z
Turn ON

Saul Landau
Kerry: a Less Dangerous Imperialist?

Richard Oxman
Nader and/or Death?

Poets' Basement
Holt, LaMorticella, Davies, Albert and Tripp

Website of the Weekend
Missing

 

 

April 2, 2004

Dave Lindorff
Barbaric Relativism: the Press and Fallujah

Kurt Nimmo
Wherever Bush Goes, Osama is Bound to Follow

Emma Miller
The Role of the West in the Rwandan Genocide

Dr. Susan Block
Same Sex Marriages: Just Say "No" to Prohibition

Norman Solomon
Media Strategy Memo for George & Dick

Sacha Guney
The Meaning of the Elections in Turkey

Christopher Brauchli
The Disturbing Case of Cpt. Yee

Website of the Day
Mercenaries, Inc.

 

April 1, 2004

Ron Jacobs
Dying in Vain in Iraq

Harry Browne
No Smoke, Plenty of Fire: Ireland's Pubs Go Smokefree

Chris Floyd
Towel Boy: Bush Hits Workers with Chemical Weapons

Nicole Colson
Inside America's Concentration Camp: Tortured at Guantanamo

Charles Arthur
Haiti's Army Cracks Down on Workers

Laura Flanders
Elaine Chao: a First Daughter for the First Son


March 31, 2004

M. Junaid Alam
Israel: Suicide Nation?

John L. Hess
Condi Under Oath: But What About the NYTs Reporters?

Fernando Suarez del Solar
A Year Since My Son's Death in Iraq

Sofia Perez
Spain's U-Turn on Iraq is Real Democracy in Action

David Vest
Stick 'Em Up: Put Cheney and Bush Under Oath

Tanya Reinhart
As in Tiannamen Square: Justice and the Yassin Assassination

Mike Whitney
Time to Dump the Pledge

Donald Kaul
Martha Stewart's Lesson: Never Talk to the FBI

Milt Bearden
Mired in the Tracks of Alexander the Great

Marjorie Cohn
The Illegal Coup in Haiti: How the Kidnapping of Aristide Violated US and International Law

Website of the Day
New Pentagon Papers Dropped at DC Starbucks

 

 

March 30, 2004

William S. Lind
An Occurrence in Pakistan: the Battle That Wasn't

Ron Jacobs
Assassinations, Hate Mail & Justice

Mickey Z.
Tommy Boy Friedman Does "Imagine"

Neve Gordon
Strategic Motives of the Yassin Assassination

Mark Scaramella
The Founding Scam: Insider Trading is the American Way

John Chuckman
The Countessa of Empire: Condi Rice's Idea of Democracy

Greg Moses
Live from Pasadena: Silhouettes of New Order

Rai O'Brien
What Kind of Democracy to Expect if the Opposition Takes Power in Venezuela

Bill Christison
The 9/11 Commission: Dangerous Harbinger for the Future

Website of the Day
Ghost Town: Riding Through Chernobyl

 


March 29, 2004

John Maxwell
Crisis in the Caribbean: a Miasma Foretold

J. Michael Springmann
Email Spying & Attorney Client Privilege

Robert Fisk / Severin Carrell
Coalition of the Mercenaries

The Black Commentator
Haiti's Troika of Terror

Doug Giebel
Candide in the Wilderness:
How Bush Policy Was Made

David Krieger
The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Bargain

Mike Whitney
Rejecting the Language of Terrorism

Richard Oxman
The Pitts: a 9/11 Burrow of an American Family

Kim Scipes
The AFL-CIO in Venezuela: Deja Vu All Over Again

Michael Donnelly
End Game for Northwest Forests

Norman Solomon
The Media Politics of 9/11

Kathy Kelly
Last Lines Before Vanishing

Website of the Day
Swans: Can Money Buy Everything?

 

 

March 27 / 28, 2004

Jeffrey St. Clair
Empire of the Locusts

Gary Leupp
The Yassin Assassination: Prelude to an Attack on Syria

William A. Cook
The Yassin Assassination: a Monstrous Insanity Blessed by the US

Faheem Hussain
Some Thoughts on Waziristan: Once and Always a Colonial Army

Elaine Cassel
Is Playing Paintball Terrorism?

Larry Birns / Jessica Leight
Disturbing Signals: Kerry and Latin America

John Ross
Bush Tells the World: "Drop Dead"

John Eskow
A Memo to Karl Rove from the Hollywood Caucus

Alan Maass
Who Are the Real Terrorists?

Dave Lindorff
Spineless of US Journalists

Joe Bageant
Howling in the Belly of the Confederacy

Dave Zirin
Reasonable Doubt: Why Barry Bonds is Not on Steroids

Craig Waggoner
Who Would Mel's Jesus Nuke?

The Kerry Quandry

Joel Wendland
Marxists for Kerry

Josh Frank
Scary, Scary John Kerry

Matt Vidal
Spoilers, Electability and the Poverty of American Democracy

Poets' Basement
LaMorticella, Hamod, Guthrie, Davies and Albert

Website of the Weekend
Say a Little Prayer

 

 

March 26, 2004

Christopher Brauchli
There's a Chill Over the Country

Robert Fisk
The Man Who Knew Too Much: the Ordeal of Mordechai Vanunu

Joe DeRaymond
Democracy in El Salvador? Think Again

Mike Whitney
Lessons on Apartheid from Ariel Sharon

Mickey Z.
Somalia and Iraq: Looking Back and Ahead

Chris Floyd
The Pentagon Archipelago

CounterPunch Photo Wire
Cheney's Close Shave?

John Breneman
Bush's Comic Bomb

Website of the Day
Dick is a Killer

 

March 25, 2004

Lee Sustar
Who is to Blame for Lost Jobs?

Standard Schaefer
An Interview with Michael Hudson on Offshore Banking Centers

Roger Burbach
Lula vs. the IMF: Brazil Begins to Throw Off the Austerity Planners

Jimmer Endres
Elections Without Politics: The Military Budget Is Not an "Issue"

Larry Tuttle
Acting in Your Name: Identity Theft and Public Interest Groups

Toni Solo
Misreporting Venezuela

Dan Bacher
A Memorial Wall for Iraq War's Dead and Wounded

Saul Landau
Is Venezuela Next?

Website of the Day
The Spiral Railway

 

 

March 24, 2004

Gary Leupp
General Musharraf's IOU

Richard Oxman
Shakespeare for Kerry

William Lind
The Beginning of Phase Three: 4G Warfare Hits Iraq

Rep. Ron Paul
Iraq One Year Later

Michael Dempsey
Killing Rachel Corrie Again

Alan Farago
The Bad Math of Mercury: Bush's War on the Unborn

Benjamin Dangl
and April Howard
Media in Cuba

John L. Hess
No Lie Left Behind: Judy Miller Does Dick Clarke

Greg Weiher
Two Cheers for Dems: "We're Not as Bad as George"

Eva Golinger
An Open Letter to John Kerry on Venezuela

Grayson Childs
Where's Cynthia McKinney?

Steve Niva
Israel's Assassinations will Only Fuel More Suicide Bombings

Website of the Day
The Bushiad and the Idiossey

 

 

March 23, 2004

Phillip Cryan
The Drug War's Next Casualty: Colombia's National Parks

Ron Jacobs
They Shoot Men in Wheelchairs, Too?

Dave Lindorff
A Spanish Parallel: Scare Tactics and Elections

Mike Whitney
Richard Clarke and Teflon George

Brian McKinlay
Bush's Lil' Buddy in Trouble: John Howard Starts to Wobble

JG
Driving Mr. Koon: "Jim Crow Lives Next Door"

Phyllis Pollack
Gettin' Jigga with Metallica: the Battle Over the Double Black CD

Ahmed Bouzid
Sharon's One-Way Track

Sean Carter
The G-Word Goes to Court: One Nation Under [Your Logo Here]

M. Shahid Alam
World's Greatest Country: Do the Facts Lie

 

March 22, 2004

Mazin Qumsiyeh
On Extrajudicial Executions

Uri Avnery
The Assassination of Sheikh Yassin is Worse Than a Crime

Gilad Atzmon
Sharon's Rampage

Mike Whitney
Guilty Until Proven Innocent: the Story of Captain James Yee

Jason Leopold
Firm With Ties to Cheney Faces Criminal Indictment in Cal Energy Scam

Greg Moses
Stop Walling and Stalling: a Report from Houston's Peace March

Phil Gasper
San Francisco: 25,000 March for an End to the Occupation

Lenni Brenner
Report from NYC: Old and Young Parade for Peace

Julian Borger
The Clarke Revelations

Steve Perry
Karl Rove's Moment

Website of the Day
Enviros Against War

 

 

March 20 / 21, 2004

Alexander Cockburn
Gay Marriage: Sidestep on Freedom's Path

Jeffrey St. Clair
Intolerable Opinions in an Age of Shock and Awe: What Would Lilburne Do?

Ted Honderich
Tony Blair's Moral Responsibility for Atrocities

Saul Landau / Farrah Hassen
The Plot Against Syria: an Irresponsibility Act

Gary Leupp
On Viewing "The Passion of the Christ"

William A. Cook
Fence, Barrier, Wall

Phil Gasper
Bush v. Bush-lite: Chomsky's Lesser Evilism

Ron Jacobs
Fox News and the Masters of War

John Stanton
Which Way John Kerry? The Senator's Inner Nixon

Justin Felux
Kerry and Black America: Just Another Stupid White Man

Mike Whitney
Greenspan's Treason: Swindling Posterity

Augustin Velloso
Avoiding Osama's Abyss

Lawrence Magnuson
Eyes Wide Open: Is Spain Caving in to Terrorism?

Kathy Kelly
Getting Together to Defeat Terrorism

Tracy McLellan
Scalia & Cheney: Happiness is a Warm Gun

Kurt Nimmo
Emma Goldman for President!

Luis J. Rodriguez
The Redemptive Power of Art: It's Not a Frill

Mickey Z
The Michael Moore Diet

Jackie Corr
When Harry Truman Stopped in Butte

Niranjan Ramakrishnan
The Great Trial of 1922: Gandhi's Vision of Responsibility

Poets' Basement
Stew Albert & JD Curtis

Website of the Weekend
Virtual World Election

 

 

March 19, 2004

Jeffrey St. Clair
Zapatero to Kerry: Back Off, Senator, Our Troops are Coming Home

Ann Harrison
So Protesters, How Well Do You Know Your Rights?

William MacDougall
Fortress Britain's War on "Economic Migrants"

Greg Moses
Sold American: Cowboy Nation Gets Ready to Vote

Cynthia McKinney
Haiti and the Impotence of Black America: Roll Back This Coup, Mr. Bush

Norman Solomon
Spinning the Past; Threatening the Future

John L. Hess
"Missing" Evidence and the NYTs

Vicente Navarro
The End of Aznar, Bush's Best Friend

Website of the War
Naming the Dead

 


March 18, 2004

Gila Svirsky
Rachel Corrie, One Year Later: She Never Lost Faith in Decency

Christopher Brauchli
Drilling a Hole in the Sanctions: How Halliburton Made $73 Million from Saddam

William Kulin
Report from Iraq: Just Another Baghdad Car Bombing

Mike Whitney
Resistance: a Moral Imperative

Rep. Ron Paul
Broadcast Indecency Act: an Indecent Attack on the First Amendment

Josh Frank
The Nader Question

Jack Random
They Lied & They Lost: Madrid and the Lessons of Democracy

Greg Bates
What Makes a Nader Voter Tick? A Survey

Sam Hamod / Alfredo Reyes
Contempt of the World: Hastert, Bush and Cheney on Spain

Gary Leupp
The Madrid Bombings: the Chickens Come Home to Roost

Website of the Day
Privatizing Armageddon: Buy Your Own Doomsday Key

 

March 17, 2004

Marjorie Cohn
Spain, the EU and the US: War on Terror or Civil Liberties?

David MacMichael
Untruth and Consequences

Michael Donnelly
Wear the Green, But Skip the Green Beer

Tom Stephens
"Steady Leadership": Let the Buyer Beware

Wayne Madsen
Sen. Kerry, Let Me Help You Out

Karyn Strickler
Who Owns the Sierra Club? Anonymous Donors and Rigged Elections

Peter Linebaugh
Bush: Blanc Blanc

 

March 16, 2004

Lenni Brenner
James Madison: the Anti-Clerical Father of the Bill of Rights

Scott Boehm
Madrid Diary: How to Change World Order in Four Days

Alexander Lynch
From Franco to Aznar: the History Behind the Spanish Elections

Sam Hamod and Alfredo Reyes
The Truth About the Spanish Elections: Aznar Was Going Down Anyway

Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg
You Wouldn't Do a Dog This Way: Executing David Clayton Hill

Mike Whitney
The Case for a Nuclear Iran

Robert Fisk
The Bloody Price of the "War on Terror"

Bill Christison
The Aftershocks from Madrid

CounterPunch Photo Wire
The Passion of St. Teresa

Website of the Day
Join the War on Art!

 

March 15, 2004

Harry Browne
Terror Nothing New to Europe

Mike Whitney
Justice Not Murder: the Tragic Symmetry of Terrorism

Lidice Valenzuela
Haiti: a Coup without Consultation

Greg Moses
Lessons from the Texas Primaries: Looking for a Coalition with Legs

Mickey Z.
Depraved Indifference: C-Sections, Patriarchy & Women's Health

Asaf Shtull-Trauring
AWOL in New York: From Refusenik to Organizer

CounterPunch Wire
Gen. Gramajo Executed by Bees!

 

March 12 / 14, 2004

Gabriel Kolko
The Coming Elections and the Future of American Global Power

Saul Landau
Oh, Jesus...It's the Movie!

William Blum
Neo-Con(tradictions)

William S. Lind
Why They Throw Rocks

Rahul Mahajan
The Meaning of Madrid: War on "Terrorism" Makes Us All Less Safe

Neve Gordon
Demographic Wars

Kurt Nimmo
Kerry and the Progressive Interventionists

Mickey Z.
The "New" UN Blames the Poor

Mike Whitney
War Games: the American Media Leads the Charge

Helen Scott and Ashley Smith
Aristide's Fall: What Led to the Coup?

Justin E.H. Smith
Loïc Wacquant: Against a Sociodicy of the American Prison

Brandy Baker
Him Again? Al Gore Needs to Move On

Robin Philpot
Nobody Can Call It a "Plane Crash" Now: the Report on the Assassination of Rwandan President Habyarimana

Mokhiber / Weissman
The Meat Monopoly Takes a Rare Pounding

Dave Zirin
She Turned Her Back on the War: an Interview with Toni Smith

Daniel Wolff
The Lord's Pier

 

Hot Stories

Alexander Cockburn
Behold, the Head of a Neo-Con!

Subcomandante Marcos
The Death Train of the WTO

Norman Finkelstein
Hitchens as Model Apostate

Steve Niva
Israel's Assassination Policy: the Trigger for Suicide Bombings?

Dardagan, Slobodo and Williams
CounterPunch Exclusive:
20,000 Wounded Iraqi Civilians

Steve J.B.
Prison Bitch

Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber
True Lies: the Use of Propaganda in the Iraq War

Wendell Berry
Small Destructions Add Up

CounterPunch Wire
WMD: Who Said What When

Cindy Corrie
A Mother's Day Talk: the Daughter I Can't Hear From

Gore Vidal
The Erosion of the American Dream

Francis Boyle
Impeach Bush: A Draft Resolution

Click Here for More Stories.

 

 

Subscribe Online


Search CounterPunch

 

Weekend Edition
April 9 / 11, 2004

A Review of "The Last Samurai"

Indian Wars, Vietnam and Orientalist Fantasy

By GARY LEUPP

The "Shogun" Precedent

I was studying Japanese history in grad school in 1980, when the 10-hour miniseries Shogun, starring Richard Chamberlain and based on the best-selling novel by James Clavell, was first shown on television. Set in the year 1600, it was a blockbuster, attracting more viewers than any such series since Roots, and a huge boon to the obscure field of Japanese studies. Enrollments in Japanese language courses shot up immediately. Scholars in the Japan field winced at some of the film's historical inaccuracies (for example, women in Japan in 1600 just didn't do tea ceremony), but were delighted at the interest it sparked. Some in Japan were also bothered by the errors, but were happy that Shogun produced positive interest in their country, which had met with what they called "Japan-bashing" throughout the 1970s due to bôeki masatsu or "trade friction."

In the series, a Dutch ship piloted by the Englishman John Blackthorne arrives unexpectedly in Japan soon before a fateful battle brings Lord Toranaga to power as the shogun (military dictator) of the country. There are Portuguese and Spaniards in Japan already, Catholic missionaries and merchants who have concealed from the Japanese the existence of Protestant Europe and who are determined to maintain an Iberian monopoly on the Japan trade while spreading Catholicism. Their interests are threatened by the Protestant newcomers' arrival, and they urge Toranaga to execute Blackhorne and his mates as pirates. Instead, Toranaga warms to Blackthorne, frees him from jail and awards him the two swords connoting samurai status as well as a fief. The Englishman rapidly learns Japanese and Japanese ways, and of course, since this is a movie, falls in love with an elite, beautiful Japanese woman. She dies at the end, having collaborated with Toronaga to incinerate Blackthorne's ship, to insure that he will never leave Japan but remain to serve the shogun.


The Real "Shogun" Story

Shogun was based on a true story more interesting than Clavell's creation. There was in fact an English pilot, William Adams (1564-1620), who fought against the Spanish Armada, entered the service of the Dutch East India Company, arrived in Japan in 1600, was imprisoned and, after Jesuits accused him of piracy, was interrogated by the warlord Tokugawa Ieyasu. He won the lord's trust, became one of his advisors as Ieyasu grasped power as shogun, thereafter received a village fief and samurai status, had a mansion in Edo (Tokyo), facilitated the operations of both the Dutch East India Company and the English East India Company in Japan, married a Japanese woman (a Catholic convert, although Adams was Anglican), had two children by her, and died in Japan in 1620. (He also had a wife back in England, to whom he wrote bemoaning the fact that Ieyasu wouldn't allow him to leave the country. In fact, he could and did leave Japan for the Ryukyus and Siam on commercial voyages; he probably could have gone back to England and lived very well, but preferred his lot in his adopted country. His letters to his English wife don't mention the Japanese spouse.)

When the first British merchants made their way to Japan in 1611, and met the legendary figure now known as Miura Anjin (Miura was his wife's surname; "Anjin" means pilot), they were shocked by his samurai haircut, dress, swords, retinue, apparent preference for Japanese company, and fierce loyalty to his Japanese in-laws. They detected his distaste for their own ways, which now apparently struck him as uncouth, and called him a "naturalized Japaner." He had earlier sent a letter to England declaring that the Japanese were "governed in great civility---I mean, not a land better governed in the world by civil policy." He'd noted that while the Japanese were superstitious, they held "diverse views" about religion, and their justice was administered impartially.

The real story here is that a man from Shakespeare's England, a country that had seen much injustice and religious intolerance, could happily naturalize in a pagan island country, separated from his first one by the vast Eurasian continent. Here (according to one Jesuit writing in the late sixteenth century), the people were "superior to other Eastern peoples but also to Europeans as well." A people who, according to another Jesuit writing in 1577, were "in no sense barbarous Excluding the advantage of religion," he declared, "we are ourselves in comparison with them are most barbarous." (This respect for the Japanese obliged the Europeans to fit them into their worldview as necessarily white. Almost all the sixteenth-century descriptions state: "These are a white people") The film Shogun made the Englishman's settlement in Japan the result of the machinations of a wily warlord. The real record suggests Adams made up his own mind, deciding that, for him, Tokugawa Japan was preferable to England. Imagine a film organized around that theme: at the dawn of western capitalism, there could be cultures more attractive to Europeans than their own.

 

An American Samurai

Twenty-four years after Shogun, I eagerly stood in line for the film Last Samurai, starring Tom Cruise, with my wife (a Cruise-fan who, by coincidence, is descended from samurai on both paternal and maternal sides), and our adolescent son. Our teenage daughter had already heard that the film was "really bad," and I'd heard that it had received some criticism pertaining to the white guy's implausibly central role in the action. But I figured that any movie about Japan in the 1870s, starring Cruise, would have to center around the white guy, and I wasn't going to boycott the film just because it did so. Having seen the film, my verdict is: it's not "really bad." In most respects it's quite good. The basic story line is that a Captain Woodrow Algren, a brilliant soldier and veteran of the Civil War and the "Indian Wars," is recruited by his former commanding officer to sail with him to Japan as a mercenary military advisor to the newly established Japanese government. The regime, headed by a youthful emperor manipulated by westernizing advisors, confronts a rebellion organized by former samurai. "The emperor wants the modern," Algren is told. "The samurai want the old."

Algren is clearly supposed to remind us of the disillusioned, traumatized, frag-prone Vietnam War vet. (Those who've seen Tom Cruise in Oliver Stone's brilliant antiwar film Born on the 4th of July will most easily make the association.) He has followed orders and slaughtered Native Americans, and blames his smugly amoral former commander for ordering him to do so. He frankly tells the officer as he agrees to mercenary service in Japan: "I'd happily kill you for free." But plagued by guilt (knowing he is ultimately responsible for his own actions), Algren has become a prisoner of the bottle. Arriving in Japan, he competently trains government troops (who appear quite incompetent) in the latest U.S. infantry tactics. In an engagement with the rebels, led by one "Katsumoto" (Ken Watanabe), he is taken prisoner following various heroics that much impress the insurgent leader---who conveniently speaks fluent English. Algren, mastering in a few months one of the world's more difficult languages, is well-treated by Katsumoto and gradually won over to the cause of the rebels, who view themselves as loyal to the emperor but opposed to his corrupt advisors.

In glorious battle pitting sword-wielding samurai against breech-loading and repeating rifles, with cherry-blossoms (in their beautiful transience, the traditional symbol of the samurai born to die young) in the background, Katsumoto is mortally injured. Rather than be taken by the enemy alive, he has Algren stab him to death. (This is an interesting variation of seppuku, vulgarly known as hara-kiri.) Then Algren gets to kill his former American CO, who's been fighting on the other side. In this inter-American squabble, Americanized bushidô (the Way of the Warrior) overtakes the Way of Gen. Custer.

Rather than facing charges as a result of his actions, Algren is able to barge into a meeting between the Emperor and his advisors, who are just about to sign a treaty with the U.S. granting trade concessions in return for arms imports. Algren, invoking Katsumoto's name, moves the vacillating emperor into rejecting the unequal treaty.

The story line more or less works, dramatically. But what's the real history here? The Last Samurai is set in 1876-7, a time when, in fact, the new Meiji regime (established in 1868) confronted the largest in a series of rebellions mounted by members of the formally abolished samurai class, who comprised about 7% of the Japanese population. (It occurred in the southwestern island of Kyushu, not the mountains of Yoshino in central Japan as depicted in the film.) The movie doesn't make the cause of these rebellions very clear, and implies that they occurred in protest of governmental corruption. In fact they resulted more from the abolition of samurai status, the commutation of samurai stipends into low-yield bonds, establishment of a conscript national army drawn mostly from the peasantry, and the failure of the new regime to launch foreign wars to provide opportunities for battlefield heroism. Saigô Takamori, the inspiration for Katsumoto, left the government in 1873 after powerful colleagues rejected his plans for an invasion of Korea. Devoting himself to the cause of assisting destitute former samurai in his home province, Saigô was called upon by former retainers to head up an insurrection already in progress, doing so with some reluctance out of a sense of feudal loyalty.

The revolt had little progressive content, required some 60,000 government troops to suppress about 40,000 insurgents, almost bankrupted the regime and caused it to squeeze the peasantry harshly to finance the new conscript army. But the figure of Saigô, who committed seppuku as his cause failed, was revered by many people. So there he stands in the form of a huge statue (one of Japan's best-known monuments), in Tokyo's Ueno Park to this day. There's a real man for you, some Japanese will say. (See Ivan Morris, The Nobility of Failure: Tragic Heroes in the History of Japan to get some insight into the Saigô cult.)

Some Necessary Background: Isolation and Capitalism

In the 1630s, within two decades following William Adams' death, the grandson of Ieyasu ordered the expulsion of almost all foreigners and their Japanese wives and descendents from the country. (Adam's son Joseph and daughter Suzannah may have been exempted from the order.) The shogun extirpated Christianity, forbade Japanese from leaving the country on pain of death should they ever return, and allowed only a trickle of trade with Europe through a handful of Dutch merchants confined to quarters on a tiny artificial island constructed off Nagasaki. For the next two and a half centuries, Japan was about as aloof from the international trading system as a major nation could ever be. You might say it resisted globalization, and contemporary globalization proponents might suppose it suffered enormously as a result. But on the contrary---since the Tokugawa shogunate forced the samurai to leave agricultural villages and reside in castle-towns, there was a massive wave, unprecedented in world history, in urban construction. By 1700 a larger proportion of Japanese lived in cities than did people anywhere else except maybe Holland. The emerging cities stimulated all kinds of commercial production in the countryside; traditional labor arrangements based on corvée or lifetime service gave way to contracted wage-labor, and the sprouts of capitalism materialized in Japan as they did nowhere else outside of the west.

"Capitalism succeeded in Europe," wrote the historian Ferdinand Braudel, "made a beginning in Japan, and failedalmost everywhere else." There were large-scale manufacturing workshops in Tokugawa Japan; legions of wealthy merchants employing such devices as double-entry bookkeeping, letters of credit, and non-negotiable prices; big dry-goods shops named Mitsui, Daimaru, Mitsukoshi (the direct ancestors of the present conglomerates); theoretical works on market economics; employment agencies, etc. Isolated Tokugawa Japan was not backward but relatively advanced as of the mid-nineteenth century.

But just at that point, the U.S. Congress, which saw Japan's isolationism as not just stupid---and a challenge to Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, the classical statement of capitalist economics published in 1776---but immoral, authorized a military expedition to Japan to demand that Japan open its doors to the world market. Persuaded that the U.S. would use military force if spurned, the Tokugawa shogunate capitulated, signing a treaty that went into effect in 1859. It opened ports to U.S. visitation and residence, accepted a tariff schedule injurious to Japan, accorded U.S. citizens exemption from Japanese legal jurisdiction, and specified that any privilege given any other foreign power (Russia, Britain, France and other nations were negotiating treaties with Japan) also automatically apply to the U.S. For the first half-century after its forced "opening" (the British allowed the "unequal treaties" they'd contracted to elapse soon after 1900) Japan was forced to participate in global commerce on inherently disadvantageous terms. (This is worth recalling when issues of "unfair trading practices" come up in the contemporary U.S.-Japan relationship.)

There was an immediate currency crisis as the country joined the world system; gold flowed out of the country, the value of laborers' wages plummeted, silk thread was diverted from domestic consumers to foreign ones. The legitimacy of the regime was undermined, peasant rebellions proliferated, and xenophobic feelings prompted young samurai to attack foreigners and government officials. But gradually the headstrong youth opposing the country's opening concluded that Japan indeed had to join the international system, and shifted their slogans from "Revere the Emperor, Expel the Barbarian" to "Civilization and Enlightenment" (meaning: learn from western civilization, and seek western enlightenment while discarding the useless heritage of China) and "Rich Country, Strong Army" (meaning: learn the west's industrial secrets, invest in steel and shipbuilding, and colonize neighboring territory). Dissident leaders promoting such values and in command of some military might succeeded in toppling the last shogun in the Meiji Restoration of 1868. The above-mentioned Saigô was generally with the program, and most samurai embraced it.

But then the new group in power arranged the dissolution of the feudal domains, replaced by prefectures administered from the center. Samurai retainers of the over 250 Japanese barons were suddenly (in theory) servants of a centralized state that had to pay out the stipends to which they were hereditarily entitled. It was too much of a budget burden for the newborn Meiji state. Gradually samurai status was eliminated, such perks as the exclusive right to bear arms taken away from the ancient warrior class, and the samurai stipends commuted to low-interest bonds. Ironically, it was the ruling samurai clique who undertook these radical reforms, effectively abolishing their own class status. The leaders launched a conscript army, drawing mainly on the peasants, although it was to see little action for a generation. The samurai having lost their raison d'être, were encouraged to turn their energies to trade and industry, fields they had hitherto been schooled to treat with contempt. Some finessed the transition; the Mitsubishi conglomerate was founded by an ex-samurai. But many others responded with indignation. These are the reasons for the rash of samurai rebellions in western Japan between 1874 and 1877.

 

Foreign Employees in "Open" Japan

During that period thousands of foreigners, mostly Englishmen, were employed by the Japanese government as teachers, technology specialists, and advisers. Algren is supposed to be one of these oyatoi gaikokujin (honored foreign employees). But in fact, the Japanese had their military act together pretty well by the 1870s and did not require foreign assistance in suppressing the samurai uprisings, even though the rebellions were raised by troops using whatever latest military technology they could procure. Thus the depiction of Katsumoto's samurai as champions of "pure" sword-fighting versus modern rifles is historically not just amusing, but rude to the memory of the samurai who were actually very practical in the adoption of new technology. (The musket was introduced into Japan by Portuguese in 1543, and almost immediately replicated and manufactured in massive quantities. There were far more rifles in Japan by 1600 than in Elizabeth I's England; the Japanese even made design improvements, and exported their own guns to Siam and elsewhere. Guns were not much needed during Japan's long period of peace---although they were used to suppress peasant uprisings---but sensing the threat of foreign encroachment in the early nineteenth century the Japanese painstakingly translated and carefully studied Dutch texts on military technology.) In 1877, samurai rebels used firearms (Enfield muzzle loading rifles), mountain guns, field guns, and mortars against government forces quite well, actually.

To return to the closing scene of The Last Samurai: The Meiji emperor is just about to sign a treaty with the U.S. exchanging trade privileges for arms. Into this scene barges Tom Cruise/Captain Algren, who for some reason is still at large having aided a rebel and killed a prominent American. The emperor listens respectfully as Algren upholds Katsumoto's cause and denounces the treaty. Well, part of me thinks: This is excellent. Here's an alienated ex-pat, who understands the brutality of his homeland's government very well. He's seduced by the charm of Japan, and wants passionately to protect Japan from western encroachment.

But the scene, alas, is highly unrealistic. Nothing like this agreement was ever in fact actually contemplated. The key trade agreement had already been forced upon the Japanese through the implied threat of military force two decades earlier. And no foreigner, even as good-looking as Tom Cruise (who would anyway have bristled with unsightly facial hair in this period) could have just popped in on the Meiji emperor anytime in 1877, counseled him about treaties, and moved him to take a stand one way or the other about a treaty, countermanding the Meiji oligarchs who collectively made policy. The movie gets the geopolitics all wrong, granting the U.S. both more and less power than it wielded in Japan in the period. (Soon after the opening of Japan's ports produced by U.S. pressure, the U.S. became preoccupied by its Civil War and the British became the main foreign influence and trading partner.) But the idea that the imperial regime could have stood up to U.S. pressure in 1877, encouraged by---of all people---an American resident soldier as depicted in the closing scene, is a huge stretch.

 

Japan as Alternative

Like Shogun, Last Samurai depicts a preindustrial Japan able to engage the west on its own selective terms---a Japan commanding the westerner's respect, even humbling him and causing him to rethink his relationship to his own culture. (I say "him" because there were very, very few western women up to the 1880s.) It exalts Tom Cruise with an implausible role in events, but the film hints that the American does, at the end, settle down in Japan (with a woman whose husband he has killed), having become thoroughly alienated from his own due to his experiences in its ugly wars. Japan, that is, conquers him spiritually. Quite a number of Victorians, actually (most notably, the journalist Lafcadio Hearn), did settle down in the country in the late nineteenth century. There were many reasons. Some were captivated by the culture generally, admiring its aesthetics or its openness to ideas. (Darwin's theory of evolution, taught at Tokyo Imperial University from early on, met with an enthusiastic reception---to the delight of foreign scholars whose advocacy of the theory met with religious opposition at home. All three volumes of Marx's Capital were translated into Japanese before they were available in most European languages.)

Some enjoyed the matter-of-fact, largely taboo-free attitudes towards the body and sex. Many western men found Japanese women fascinating, not because of their putative docility rumored in ports around Asia; the stereotype of the doll-like playmate entertained by the curious foreign man arriving in Japan typically collapsed soon after he disembarked, as in the case of French naval officer Pierre Loti recounted in his Madame Chrysanthème (1888). What struck the western male about the Japanese female was less her femininity contrasted to the supposedly masculizing western female model, than her expression of aspects of Japanese culture (including some moral and martial qualities) that happened to invite his admiration. We get some sense of this in Last Samurai.

During the twilight of the samurai, an extraordinary range of prominent foreign men, from Hearn to Sir Edwin Arnold to the Portuguese diplomat-writer Wenceslau de Moraes, the Anglo-Irish journalist Frank Brinkley, the Scottish linguist and historian James Murdoch, pioneer seismologist John Milne, architect Josiah Conder and J. P. Morgan's millionaire nephew George Dennison Morgan, all married Japanese women. "Interracial marriage" was highly controversial at this time, in the west and in Japan, although in Japan there were some who (influenced by a misreading of Darwin) positively advocated Caucasian-Japanese intermarriage in order to "enrich" the Japanese gene pool. Morgan's family ostracized him. Arnold's wife, on the other hand, was recognized as a member of the British nobility. The perception of the Japanese as a "white" people worth mixing with at many levels persisted into the twentieth century. When the Japanese triumphed over czarist Russia in 1905, the victory had to be explained in racial terms. An American scholar declared that the Japanese were the most "un-Mongoloid" people in East Asia, and must have "Aryan blood in their veins." Well, of course. How else could they have defeated Europeans?

Last Samurai depicts a disillusioned American war veteran embracing the code of bushidô, moved by the example of Katsumoto, in order to regain his self-respect. It is an orientalist fantasy. The real story is that of westerners encountering a culture not only as sophisticated as their own, but capable of defending itself, while what the somewhat over-rated historian Walter Lefeber calls "the clash" between the U.S. and Japan began in the nineteenth century. Samurai rebels didn't need foreign mercenaries to organize them, assist in their belly-slitting, or represent their cause to the Emperor during the early Meiji period. Some westerners, on the other hand, needed Japan to lend them an escape from themselves. In this Japan provided, maybe continues to provide, a vital service. There should be a movie about this.

Gary Leupp is Professor of History at Tufts University, and Adjunct Professor of Comparative Religion. He is the author of Servants, Shophands and Laborers in in the Cities of Tokugawa Japan; Male Colors: The Construction of Homosexuality in Tokugawa Japan; and Interracial Intimacy in Japan: Western Men and Japanese Women, 1543-1900.

He can be reached at: gleupp@granite.tufts.edu

 

 

 




 

Weekend Edition Features for April 3 / 4, 2004

Alexander Cockburn
Anti-Depressants a Problem? We're Shocked

Jeffrey St. Clair
How Neil Bush Succeeded in Business Without Really Trying

Gary Leupp
On Jefferson, Diderot and the Political Uses of God

Lawrence Davidson
Orwell and Kafka in Israel / Palestine

Frederick B. Hudson
Condi Rice: the Family Retainer

Phillip Cryan
The Magic of Coca-Cola: Colombian Workers, Civil Rights and Advertising

Dave Zirin
Lester Speaks: an Interview with Lester "Red" Rodney

Ben Tripp
Talking Dirty: Obscene But Not Heard

Bruce Anderson
Phony Liberals and Fake Concern for the Homeless

Bill Fletcher, Jr.
Justice and Legitimacy in Haiti

Mark Scaramella
Do You Have What It Takes to Be Sec. of Defense? Take the Rumsfeld Quiz

Sharon Smith
Do Most Iraqis Really Want the US to Stay?

Rick Giombetti
Melissa Ann Rowland: a Witch for Our Time

Nader/Kerry Quandary

Stephen Gowans
Communists for Capitalism?

Frank Bardacke / Doug Lummis
Support Nader; Dump Bush: an Election Manifesto

Mickey Z
Turn ON

Saul Landau
Kerry: a Less Dangerous Imperialist?

Richard Oxman
Nader and/or Death?

Poets' Basement
Holt, LaMorticella, Davies, Albert and Tripp

Website of the Weekend
Missing



Keep CounterPunch Alive:

Make a Tax-Deductible Donation Today Online!

home / subscribe / about us / books / archives / search / links /