home / subscribe / donate / books / archives / search / links / feedback / events / faq
Inside the New Print Edition of Our Subscriber-Only Newsletter!
Meat and Empire
The pig-raising factories of Smithfield Farms stretch from Mexico to Rumania and back to home sty in North Carolina, where swine flu first mutated. Viewing Earth from outer space an alien ecologist might conclude cows are the dominant species of our planet. Alexander Cockburn on the conquest landscapes of the meat-producers. Nanotechnologies, say their boosters, are changing the way people think about the future. They rush to buy nano-products. But how safe are they? Steven Higgs has a chastening message for us. And Senator James Abourezk concludes his vivid “Adventures in Indian Country”, with the story of the occupation of Wounded Knee. Yes, he was there and he was one scared senator. Get your new edition today by subscribing online or calling 1-800-840-3683 Contributions to CounterPunch are tax-deductible. Click here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now! CounterPunch books and gear make great presents.
Order CounterPunch By Email For Only $35 a Year !
Meet & Debate (Perhaps Even Date) CPers Online at CounterPunch's New Facebook Page!
|
Today's Stories May 29-31, 2009 Vijay Prashad May 28, 2009 Joan Roelofs Paul Craig Roberts Ralph Nader Mouin Rabbani Joe Bageant James McEnteer Dedrick Muhammad Richard Morse David Macaray Harvey Wasserman Website of the Day May 27, 2009 Joanne Mariner Paul Craig Roberts Walden Bello Dave Lindorff Brian M. Downing Carlos Villarreal Nadia Hijab Adam Federman Laray Polk Isabella Kenfield David Michael Green Website of the Day May 26, 2009 Manuel Garcia, Jr. Mike Whitney Sharon Smith Marjorie Cohn Dean Baker Deepankar Basu Fred Gardner Jordan Flaherty Josh Ruebner Brian Cloughley Website of the Day May 25, 2009 Diane Christian John Ross Kenneth Hartman Uri Avnery Fred Gardner Cindy Sheehan Sen. Russell Feingold Sibel Edmonds Franklin Lamb Dave Lindorff Daniel Wolff Website of the Day May 22-24, 2009 Alexander Cockburn Michael Teitelman Mike Whitney Ray McGovern Sonia Cardenas / Clive Hamilton Conn Hallinan Fred Gardner Carlo Cristofori Dean Baker Rannie Amiri Andy Worthington David Macaray Nadia Hijab Franklin Lamb Ted Newcomen David Ker Thomson David Rosen Mark Weisbrot Robert Fantina Heather Gray Farzana Versey Chris Genovali Ron Jacobs Jay Diamond Dr. Susan Block Ben Sonnenberg David Yearsley Lorenzo Wolff Poets' Basement Website of the Weekend May 21, 2009 Jeffrey St. Clair / Paul Craig Roberts Chris Floyd Gerald Paoli Zach Mason Uri Avnery Andy Worthington Niranjan Ramakrishnan Norman Solomon Dave Lindorff Website of the Day May 20, 2009 Michael Hudson Gary Leupp Michael D. Yates Jonathan Cook Peter Lee Binoy Kampmark Peter Zinn William Loren Katz Gary Lapon Trudy Bond Website of the Day May 19, 2009 Kristoffer Rehder Mike Whitney Ray McGovern Vijay Prashad Mirjam Hadar Meerschwam Mustafa Barghouthi Andy Worthington Binoy Kampmark John Walsh David Macaray Website of the Day May 18, 2009 Dave Lindorff Abdul Malik Mujahid Jonathan Cook Ben Rosenfeld Patrick Cockburn Ralph Nader Stephen Soldz Eugenia Tsao Walter Brasch Roberto Rodriguez Charlotte Laws Website of the Day May 15-17, 2009 Alexander Cockburn Jeffrey St. Clair David Rosen Mike Whitney Bruce Page Jeremy Scahill Fred Gardner Tom Barry Mats Svensson Ramzy Baroud Mark Engler Mark Weisbrot Farzana Versey Ron Jacobs Hannah Wolfe Cal Winslow David Macaray Christopher Brauchli Mark Seth Lender Robert Fantina David Ker Thomson Stephen Martin Charles R. Larson Chase Madar Kim Nicolini David Yearsley Lorenzo Wolff Poets' Basement Website of the Weekend May 14, 2009 Michael Hudson Andy Worthington Paul Craig Roberts Jonathan Cook Ray McGovern Lance Selfa David Green Dave Lindorff Frida Berrigan Sue Udry Website of the Day May 13, 2009 Brian M. Downing Gareth Porter Robert Sandels Ricardo Alarcón Eric Walberg Dave Lindorff Deepak Tripathi William S. Lind Kevin Zeese Franklin Lamb Website of the Day May 12, 2009 Gary Leupp Richard Neville Wajahat Ali Dean Baker Franklin Lamb Norman Solomon Paul Craig Roberts Lisa M. Hamilton Bob Fitrakis / David Macaray Website of the Day May 11, 2009 Andrea Peacock Michael Hudson Patrick Cockburn Ralph Nader John Kelly Saul Landau Dave Lindorff David Michael Green Anthony Papa Paul Krassner Website of the Day May 8-10, 2009 Alexander Cockburn Jeffrey St. Clair Paul Wolf Steve Niva Neve Gordon Mike Whitney Warren Hinckle Serge Halimi Gareth Porter Sharon Smith Andy Worthington Mark Weisbrot Rosa Miriam Elizalde Cyber Command and Cyber Dissident: More of the Same? David Macaray Missy Beattie Ron Jacobs Diane Farsetta Ramzy Baroud Phelie Maguire Robert Fantina Kevin Zeese Margaret Flowers, MD Dave Lindorff Richard Rhames Ben Sonnenberg Kim Nicolini Stephen Martin Charles R. Larson David Yearsley Lorenzo Wolff Poets' Basement Website of the Weekend May 7, 2009 Paul Craig Roberts Chris Floyd Andy Worthington Alan Farago Ray McGovern Dave Lindorff Eric Toussaint / Ana M. Malinow, MD Jeff Armstrong Norman Solomon Website of the Day May 6, 2009 Doug Peacock Patrick Cockburn Richard Neville Manuel Garcia, Jr. Winslow T. Wheeler Deepak Tripathi Stephen Soldz Reuven Kaminer David Macaray Kevin Zeese Marjorie Cohn Coalition for an Ethical Psychology Website of the Day
May 5, 2009 William Blum Uri Avnery Steven Higgs Dean Baker Daniel Wolff Sibel Edmonds Carole King Klein Fidel Castro Belén Fernández Dan Bacher Website of the Day May 4, 2009 James G. Abourezk Jeff Leys Patrick Cockburn Andy Worthington Jaime Avilés David Swanson Paul Craig Roberts P. Sainath Eugenia Tsao Benjamin Dangl Sami Al-Arian Website of the Day May 1 - 3, 2009 Alexander Cockburn Gary Leupp Peter Linebaugh Jeffrey St. Clair / C. G. Estabrook Patrick Cockburn Mike Whitney Pierre Sprey / Andy Worthington Mairead Maguire Nadia Hijab Diane Farsetta Michael Calderón-Zaks Richard Rhames Russell Mokhiber Ramzy Baroud Rannie Amiri Deb Reich Steven Higgs Brian Cloughley David Michael Green Farzana Versey Jim Goodman Carl Finamore Christopher Brauchli Susie Day David Yearsley Lorenzo Wolff Peter Stone Brown Poets' Basement Dominguez, Orloski and Springate Website of the Weekend April 30, 2009 Ellen Cantarow Dana L. Cloud Paul W. Lovinger / Binoy Kampmark Brian Downing Frank Snepp David Swanson Conn Hallinan Ron Jacobs John Goekler Jasmine L. Tyler / Website of the Day April 29, 2009 Joann Wypijewski Patrick Cockburn Andy Worthington Chris Floyd Dave Lindorff Jeremy Scahill Doug Henwood Michael Hudson Russell Mokhiber Eric Toussaint Website of the Day April 28, 2009 Uri Avnery Jeremy Scahill Dean Baker Michael D. Yates Conn Hallinan John Stauber Tom Barry Harvey Wasserman Jeff Nygaard Frederico Fuentes Website of the Day April 27, 2009 Pam Martens Patrick Cockburn Andrew J. Bacevich Guardian of the Status Quo: Obama's Sins of Omission Mitu Sengupta Franklin Lamb Firmin DeBrabander Dave Lindorff Russell Mokhiber Mike Whitney Mark Weisbrot Rev. José M. Tirado Website of the Day April 24-26, 2009 Alexander Cockburn Marjorie Cohn Andy Worthington Jeremy Scahill Chris Floyd Mike Whitney Anthony DiMaggio Chris Kromm Saul Landau Dave Lindorff Greg Moses Joshua Frank Fred Gardner Manuel Garcia, Jr. David Michael Green Ramzy Baroud Rannie Amiri Laura Carlsen Richard Morse Nikolas Kozloff Kent Peterson Robert Bryce Niranjan Ramakrishnan The Financial Experts Ron Jacobs Richard Rhames Stephen Martin David Yearsley Poets' Basement Website of the Weekend April 23, 2009 Eamonn Fingleton Ray McGovern Michael Ratner Alan Farago Rob Larson Nadia Hijab Fawzia Afzal-Khan Dave Lindorff Helen Redmond Adam Federman Website of the Day April 22, 2009 Chris Floyd Joanne Mariner Vijay Prashad Gareth Porter Dean Baker Peter Morici Winslow T. Wheeler Barucha Calamity Peller Harvey Wasserman Aisha Brown / Teo Ballvé Website of the Day April 21, 2009 Randy Rowland Dave Lindorff Fidel Castro George McGovern Greg Moses Benjamin Dangl Sonia Nettnin Frank Barat Binoy Kampmark John V. Walsh David Macaray Website of the Day April 20, 2009 Mike Whitney Andrea Peacock Henry A. Giroux Liaquat Ali Khan Fred Gardner Stephen Soldz Nadia Hijab Dave Lindorff P. Sainath Nelson P Valdés Mark Engler Belén Fernández Website of the Day
|
Weekend Edition Gravy Train Derailed ... Cui Bono?Big Trouble in Little BritainBy STEPHEN MARTIN
Some kind of answer to Vidal’s proposition; extrapolated by way of ‘syllogism’ to ‘incorporate’ all Politicians as ‘professional’, is playing out right now ‘across the pond’ in the ‘51st State’? ‘Small news’ - but large oak trees from little acorns grow? Or perhaps the consideration that, automatically, by definition, a ‘Hydra’ is ‘many headed’ is more apt? Under the ‘Freedom of Information Act (2000)’ on ‘Airstrip One’, as Orwell referred to Britain, the expenses claimed by elected politicians have come under close scrutiny of the taxpayers funding such ‘gravy train’ to cause of much ‘embarrassment’ of ‘honourable members’ - as elected politicians in Britain are known, and as were once passengers on said ‘gravy train’ as become derailed. There continuing to be much ‘gnashing of teeth and wailing’ amongst ‘honourable members’ as ‘perpetrators of fraud’ in the House of Commons concerning ‘illegitimate expenses’ revealed, as well as back peddle furious’ in the publicised ‘repayment’ of considerable sums to taxpayer by greatest offenders. ‘I care not who makes the laws (as banker) but that I benefit from them (as politician)’- such the price of ‘Gravy Train’? As could be said; ontology derived way of ‘Cui Bono?’ The ‘revelation’ of expenses fraud by elected British Politicians as ‘gouge’ of subject, ‘citizen’ not applicable such be the ‘Airstrip’, or such the ‘jams as require kicking out’ and as sung of by MC5, has not been without measure of theatrical resistance by House of Commons – though Henry Paulson going down on bended knee to Nancy Pelosi in a different house of politics takes some beating? ‘Nice touch, Henry’ – as if the result was ever really in doubt as to ‘Bailout’ – or indeed, apropos of the expenses claims by Politicians in Britain, just another variety of the screwing of the taxpayer by the privileged played out? In Britain as a result of expenses scandal ongoing ‘heads have rolled’ including that of Michael Martin as the British equivalent of Nancy Pelosi - and the setting is for ‘more’ despite the attempt to ‘brazen it out’ as regrettable characteristic of ‘honourable member’ as has become the norm, - and as can easily lead to following question: Is Politics no longer the ideal of ‘public service’; is it merely the serving of self interest by way of ‘Corporate shilling’ taken; being a member of such ‘club’ conferring privilege of ‘snout in trough public’ - in addition to generous remuneration provided for ‘services rendered’? (A ‘shilling’ as used to be a coin in Britain, about the worth of a ‘quarter’) Are politicians ‘in it for what they can get’, and to such ‘music’, the payer of ‘piper’ not seen as ‘Electorate’ - but ‘Financier’ or ‘Corporatist’ - and such as calls the ‘tune’? Think Wall St., think Main St. – and forget about ‘taxpayer’? Forget about the electorate. Such the tragedy of Western Capitalist Democracy ‘playing out’? As ‘Dialectic’ material, or sufferance immaterial? In terms of ‘history’ as concerns Britain, ‘taking of the shilling’ refers to a once common means of conscription into the Navy, whereby once ‘King’s Shilling’ taken, by whatever means devious; thereby ‘conscripted – or ‘owned’? As; accordant with etymology, Politician becomes mere ‘Corporate Shill’ contemporaneous? Yet there be amongst the greater body humane, despite effort of the Stateless as ‘bastards’ standing, those ‘mature’ enough to continually apply that great question ‘Cui Bono?’ - as can be resultant in leading quote above by Gore Vidal concerning ‘prepared to run’ as should be ‘automatically disqualified by definition’ ? The ‘norm Political’ being ‘questionable deeds’ as so kept hidden as to remain amongst ‘the elect’; as privilege of power, the gains individual ‘unknown’? Being that ‘corruption’ is not seen as questionable expression of privilege of power, but as ‘normal Politics’ - as in ‘so it goes’? As Mel Brooks, in character was fond of saying, as rule broken while knowing no consequences as punishment forthcoming, such the flicker of the ‘movie’ as ‘History of the World: Part 1.’ ‘It’s good to be King’ Lord Acton, or John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton, striking similar nail on the head, under different flicker, per chance of ‘candle’, when he wrote in 1887: ‘Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’? ‘Absolute power’ as vanity; as pretension, as transgression particular such the ‘bonfire’ as would be heaped upon in face of real humanity as spark to same, as ‘Wolfe American’ so howled from wilderness as truth be seen more readily; as would lead to question asked to Politician Professional by an electorate empowered by ‘Information’ as aspect of ‘Freedom’, and as essence of Democracy such the equality realised - when ‘arrogation’ be dispelled as ‘illusion’: ‘Is this the goodness of Politicians as representation of ‘the Demos’ – is it good to be ‘the Politician’?’ The study of ‘History’ as exercise in ‘selectivity’, as apperception rationalised, and concerning America, revealing one of the greatest living Historians as Howard Zinn - such as through earnest endeavour and integrity resulted in the sublime: ‘A Peoples History of the United States’? Thus to ‘embrace’ ‘Cui Bono?’ – by way of that ‘actually occurred’ – as opposed to that as ‘recorded’’ – or as close approximation as can be got at by ‘reading between the lines’ concerning current ‘imbroglio political’ on ‘Airstrip One’ … Do not want the history as passes so ‘recorded as interpreted’ such the ‘tedium of exercise of power’ thereby evidenced - but want the history as ‘real’, as ‘of the people’ , and as of such as am however small a part? (N.B.: a part, rather than apart) ‘Something is rotten in the State’? The pretension as to ‘individuality’ thus standing - as challenge to the Stateless; those whom to all appearance, but primarily of vanity, see themselves as ‘Masters of the Universe’, and unto which humanity still stands as ’Bonfire’ concerning? To return to the small point of this article, as ‘bayonet fixed’ has ‘ point’ such the pretension, and such the acknowledgement of reality; despite spin, despite apperception, despite the corruption of power as would find ramification interpreted; ‘denouement’ as ‘truth will out’? It is tragic that the leading quote by Gore Vidal, which sees Politics as refuge of scoundrel in the calculus sentential or propositional, has proven ‘perspicacious to point of prescience ’ concerning British Politician. But behind the scenes of such ‘theatre of happenstance’ lies money as interest, as Corporatism once more has reared but one ugly head; as that of ‘Hydra’? And such Hydra extends Geographic, the way Statelessness would ‘rise above’ - in form of ‘creep beneath the radar’? The fact being that the fraudulent antics of Members of Parliament in Britain have been transparent and well known for a long time to those of greater ‘freedom’ - such the arrogation as be within circle of power as exists when ‘Money talks’? The great question ‘Cui Bono’ demanding no more than a ‘following of the money’ – as leads to gain, and the enumeration of ‘Modus Operandi’? Such as would deny premise of ‘The Don’ that ‘stuff happens’? In such context, the real power behind the throne, the real ‘Capo di Tutti Capo’ , still to be revealed? To understand what is happening ‘across the pond’ with this sudden, surprising application of ‘Freedom of Information’, it is requisite to apply the ‘Vidal Principal’, or maxim of ‘Cui Bono?’ asked- and as leads ‘automatically to the disqualification’ of illusion? - Behind every deed Political there is a purpose, the norm having become that it is unsavoury, having more to do with pragmatic serving of self interest rather than the ideal of public good? Unsavoury enough as to merit ‘spin’? ’Unsavoury’ such as could TS Eliot describe ‘prepared political candidate’ as ‘Hollow Man’? In this age of ‘Digital Panopticon’, it not being unreasonable to suppose that what now known to masses in Britain, as released under auspices of ‘Private’ ( read ‘Corporate’?) Security agent through medium of ‘free press’, was long afore known by those who would exercise the ‘power of mind over mind’, as Jeremy Bentham so defined? The real question to be asked is not ‘why?’ but ‘why now?’, way of refusal to kiss outstretched hand of ‘Don’ in refusal to accept illusion? Stuff doesn’t just happen when you think ‘Cui Bono?’ The author of this small article greatly admires the First and Second amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. Does such admiration make a terrorist? - For it is indeed amongst such atmosphere of spin as would come to prevail, that this small article is written. Behind the ‘fallen head’ of the hydra in Britain; in the shadows where spin is worked, where the Stateless weave tapestry of illusion, there lurks great menace; a tyranny to freedom, as to thread of hope being denied. For the works of the Stateless are never ‘complete’, as of their nature reiterated as externalisation, as would betray the hope of humanity in the illegitimacy and as such, should be disqualified automatically by definition from ever ‘running’, even as they be ‘well prepared’ in the scheming? What is happening right now in Britain is a very dangerous thing. There is a collapse of belief in Politicians, and an accompanying anger of taxpayer as electorate which can be turned to the advantage of Fascism, or Corporatism. Add to this the collapse of the Economy, and the probability of Democracy being degenerated to Corporatism in Britain is multiplied. Do not for one moment imagine that such Corporatism will redress the balance of distribution of wealth, or injustice; Corporatism automatically by definition is the enforced repression of the many by the few in the subjugation of individuality to the body corporate as an ‘externalisation’. Corporations have rights greater than mere men is the illusion. As some deserve so much more by way of share than others is also component of same illusion. So here is how it may play out in Britain, and you have to bear in mind that we talk of what is already a ‘surveillance society’, where the average person is recorded on a Closed Circuit Camera three hundred times daily, ‘1984’ prescient by quarter of a Century concerning ‘Big Brother’. The key point to all of the following is that ‘superficiality’ prevails. The ‘Corporatist mentality’ is not a mentality encouraging questioning, it seeks to direct questioning and deflect attention. Another great American, Thomas Pynchon, captured this as ‘succinctly as prescience’ in proposing concept of ‘wrong questions’? The wrong question to ask of the expenses scandal in Britain today is: ‘why’? One of the right question is: ‘why now?’ For with such advance upon question a layer of the onion is peeled, way of refusal to accept that when it comes to gain pecuniary, we should not be looking at the crumbs at the table, but at that expropriated greater, and from which such crumbs fall? With deliberation as to scheme, and not as happenstance. We should not be looking at the petty larcenists, but at the grand larcenists whom they serve? We should not be looking at ‘stuff’ as ‘happenstance’, but at tragedy determined within ‘scheme’? We should have the awareness of insight as provided by Goering concerning how situations can be manipulated and managed with the objective of gain furthered concerning ‘war’? When it boils down to it under the heat of ‘Cui Bono’?, ‘war’ is no more than a ‘scheme’, the term being synonymous with ‘racket’. It was another great American, Smedley Butler, who enumerated such proposition from the basis of experience. So what will happen in Britain, if all goes according to scheme, is that there will be new faces - with clean expense sheets and clearer agenda as to who served. Their expense sheets will remain clean as long as they do the bidding of their masters. The same trend of freedom given up through legislation shall be voted for, and there shall be greater translation into further taxation upon the electorate, and greater expropriation so serving injustice social. There will be a time, alas, when those with memory shall be able to look from new to old – and see no difference. As the face of Corporatism be stared at in Britain, and as ‘Hydra’ be seen across a pond? Because a farm is a form of scheme, is it not, and the most nefarious scheme is that which includes man as but another animal, contributory to the gain in the ‘crop’ resultant? Say nought of Maggie, and refusal to work upon, indeed, and as would follow upon right questions being asked? Cui bono ("To whose benefit?", literally "as a to to whom?", a double dative construction) is a Latin adage that is used either to suggest a hidden motive or to indicate that the party responsible for something may not be who it appears at first to be. With respect to motive, a public works project which is purported to benefit the city may have been initiated rather to benefit a favoured campaign contributor with a lucrative contract.--Wikipedia
|
Now Available from CounterPunch Books! Spell Albuquerque: Waiting for
Lightning
|