| Weekend
Edition
December 8 / 9, 2007
Amateur
Hour at the White House
Spinning
Iran's Cetrifuges
By RAY
McGOVERN
Those
who know about the centrifuges used to refine uranium tell me they
must spin at an almost unrivaled velocity—almost unrivaled,
because Bush administration statements are being spun at equivalent
speed by White House and corporate media spiders. Without Spinmeister
Karl Rove and former spokesman Tony Snow, it is amateur hour at
the White House. And the theater would be as funny as The Daily
Show, were the subject not so serious.
Judging from President George W. Bush’s words and body language
he is far from giving up on ways to “justify” attacking
Iran’s nuclear program—weapons-related or not.
He
appears convinced he must honor the pledge he has made to Israel’s
current leaders to eliminate what they have called an “existential
threat” to Israel. This came through in a particularly pointed
way on October 17, when an agitated president ad-libbed about the
possibility of World War III, complaining loudly, “We’ve
got a leader in Iran who has announced he wants to destroy Israel.”
Not
at all helpful to the president was the judgment of U.S. intelligence
that the Iranians halted their nuclear weapons-related program in
2003, a judgment the administration made public this week. The White
House knew only too well that that this bombshell could not be kept
secret very long—the more so since Congress’ intelligence
committees, Pentagon brass, and senior CIA officials reportedly
made it quite clear they would go public if the White House did
not publish a sanitized version of the key judgments of the latest
National Intelligence Estimate.
On
Oct. 26, National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell launched
a trial balloon, declaring he would no longer declassify and release
summaries of National Intelligence Estimates, but that balloon was
quickly shot down.
So
what can Cheney and Bush do now to “justify” striking
Iran? Several months ago, about the time new intelligence established
there was no active nuclear weapons program in Iran, there were
signs in the rhetoric coming from the president and Gen. David Petraeus
that the argument was going to hinge on claims that the Iranian
Revolutionary Guards were supplying the wherewithal to kill our
troops in Iraq. Petraeus was clearly ready to play that game, but
his superior, Admiral “we’re-not-going-to-do-Iran-on-my-watch”
William Fallon would not play along. And neither would the Joint
Chiefs of Staff.
Defense
Secretary Robert Gates is now back from a brief visit to Iraq and
his caution so far on this issue suggests he is paying more heed
to Fallon than to Petraeus. In other words, there is no sign that
Gates wants to abet using Iranian meddling in Iraq as a pretext
for a military strike on Iran. Gates’ well-deserved chameleon-like
reputation counsels caution here, since a word from Cheney or Bush
could conceivably make Gates a fervent champion of this pretext
for war. But people do mature; Gates is smart; and I doubt he would
want to be so closely associated with starting a regional war, if
not WW III.
Spinning
Enrichment
So
where does that leave the beleaguered president? This week’s
spinning by the White House and subservient media suggests the administration
still thinks it can make a case for war, by obfuscating the nuclear
program in Iran. This has become clearer as administration mouthpieces
blur the distinction between uranium enrichment for a civilian energy
use (permitted to signatories of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty)
and the much more demanding requirements of a nuclear weapons program.
The
spinners have resurrected the discredited argument that Iran’s
nuclear program must be for weapons, because Iran’s oil and
gas should suffice to meet all its energy requirements. Thus, the
administration’s Pravda, also known as the editorial page
of the Washington Post, on Dec. 5: “Iran’s massive overt
investment in uranium enrichment meanwhile proceeds...even though
Tehran has no legitimate use for enriched uranium.”
And
thus another major administration mouthpiece, also known as the
New York Times, on Dec. 6, in an op-ed, “In Iran We Trust?”
by Valerie Lincy and Gary Milhollin: “Why, by the way, does
Iran even want a nuclear energy program, when it is sitting on an
enormous pool of oil that is now skyrocketing in value.”
This
is a familiar canard; i.e., that Iran’s claim that its nuclear
program is for electricity production is given the lie by its own
large oil and natural gas reserves, so uranium enrichment must be
for nuclear weapons development. Condoleezza Rice took that line
over a year and a half ago (shades of those (in)famous aluminum
tubes that she said could “only” be used in a nuclear
application but turned out to be for conventional artillery). At
about the same time Dick Cheney complained that since the Iranians
are “already sitting on an awful lot of oil and gas. Nobody
can figure why they need nuclear as well to generate energy.”
It
all makes me think of Harry Truman’s complaint: “They
must think we were born yesterday!” Rice and Cheney have selective
memories—or take us for fools. Back in 1976—with Gerald
Ford president, Dick Cheney his chief of staff, Donald Rumsfeld
secretary of defense—the Ford administration bought the Shah’s
argument that Iran needed a nuclear program to meet its future energy
requirements. That argument, of course, is even more valid today,
with the price that can be obtained for oil and the specter of Peak
Oil.
Cheney
and Rumsfeld persuaded a hesitant President Ford to offer Iran a
deal that would have meant at least $6.4 billion for U.S. corporations
like Westinghouse and General Electric, had not the Shah been unceremoniously
dumped three years later. The offer included a reprocessing facility
for a complete nuclear fuels cycle—essentially the same capability
that the U.S. and Israel now insist Iran cannot be allowed to acquire.
A
pity that our domesticated media seem unable to catch the disingenuousness.
Ray
McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of
the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in Washington, DC. A veteran
of 27 years in the analysis division of the CIA, he now serves on
the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
(VIPS).
A
shorter version of this article appeared first on constortium.org.
|