home / subscribe / donate / books / t-shirts / search / links / feedback / events / faq
Inside the New Print Edition of Our Subscriber-Only Newsletter!
Obama and Black America
Ten months into Obama-time, the plight of black Americans is terrible. Yet overwhelmingly they rally behind the president. In a powerful report from the Deep South Kevin Alexander Gray asks the question: what should the black political agenda be? Mark Rudd counterposes “organizing” with “activism” and describes what it will take to build a movement. H. Bruce Franklin gives a chronology of the march into Afghanistan. Get your new edition today by subscribing online or calling 1-800-840-3683 Contributions to CounterPunch are tax-deductible. Click here to make a donation. If you find our site useful please: Subscribe Now! CounterPunch books and t-shirts make great presents.Order CounterPunch By Email For Only $35 a Year !
Meet & Debate (Perhaps Even Date) CPers Online at CounterPunch's New Facebook Page
|
Today's Stories October 21, 2009 Pam Martens October 20, 2009 Sharon Smith Tariq Ali Mark Brenner Bouthaina Shaaban Michael D. Yates Dean Baker Dave Lindorff John Ross Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada Kevin Zeese Gilad Atzmon Website of the Day October 19, 2009 Mike Whitney Greg Moses John Ross Michael Donnelly Jayne Lyn Stahl Eric Walberg Russell Mokhiber Barbara Rose Johnston John V. Whitbeck Christopher Ketcham Website of the Day October 16-18, 2009 Alexander Cockburn Saul Landau Paul Craig Roberts Carl Ginsburg Ralph Nader Nikolas Kozloff Carlo Galli Dave Lindorff Catherine Rottenberg
/ Neve Gordon Marshall Auerback Nicola Nasser Windy Cooler James L. Secor Ron Jacobs Wes Jackson Jesse Lerner-Kinglake David Ker Thomson Against Leaders Missy Beattie Emily Ratner Stephen Martin Michael Snedeker Charles R. Larson David Yearsley Peter Stone Brown Poets' Basement Website of the Weekend October 15, 2009 Andrew Cockburn Brian M. Downing Ramzy Baroud Danny Weil M. Idrees Ahmad Margaret Kimberley Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada Harvey Wasserman Nirmal Ghosh Charles R. Larson Website of the Day October 14, 2009 Michael Neumann M. Reza Pirbhai Gareth Porter Paul Craig Roberts John Strausbaugh Fortress Moon Ralph Nader Dean Baker Charles Modiano Nadia Hijab Walter Brasch Website of the Day October 13, 2009 Peter Linebaugh Shamus Cooke John Ross Brendan Cooney Frida Berrigan Yves Engler David Macaray Dave Lindorff Mark Weisbrot Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada Binoy Kampmark Website of the Day October 12, 2009 Pam Martens Mike Whitney Martha Rosenberg Jessica Arents Eamonn McCann Bill Hatch Sen. Russell Feingold Niranjan Ramakrishnan Gideon Levy Iyad Burnat Alan Cabal Dan Bacher Website of the Day October 9-11, 2009 Alexander Cockburn James Bovard Kathleen and Bill Christison Andy Worthington Marc Levy Tariq Ali Mike Whitney Paul Craig Roberts Alan Nasser Jack Z. Bratich Steve Breyman David Michael Green Dave Lindorff Paul Buchheit Jim Goodman Missy Beattie Michael Leonardi Nadia Hijab Mel Packer David Macaray James T. Phillips Charles R. Larson Michael Donnelly David Yearsley Lorenzo Wolff Poets' Basement Website of the Weekend October 8, 2009 Saul Landau Paul Fitzgerald / Linn Washington, Jr. Marshall Auerback Dave Lindorff David Rosen Chris Darimont / Misty MacDuffee John V. Walsh Stewart Lawrence Charles R. Larson Website of the Day October 7, 2009 Brendan Cooney Paul Craig Roberts Dean Baker Jonathan Cook John Stanton Joanne Mariner Ricardo Alarcón de Quesada Stephen Lendman Sen. Russell Feingold Mary Lynn Cramer Website of the Day October 6, 2009 Mike Whitney Gareth Porter Jonathan Cook Boris Kagarlitsky Iain Boal Ron Jacobs John Ross Michael Dickinson Stephen Fleischman Ira Glunts Missy Beattie Website of the Day October 5, 2009 Pam Martens Mike Whitney Paul Craig Roberts Harry Browne Sara Mann Omar Barghouti Shamus Cooke Brenda Norrell Fred Gardner Binoy Kampmark Copenhagen Blues: McChrystal and the Afghan Trap Website of the Day October 2-4, 2009 Alexander Cockburn Saul Landau Diana Johnstone Greg Moses William Blum Brian Cloughley Russell Mokhiber John Ross Ellen Brown David Ker Thomson David Macaray Gary Engler Robert Fantina Lisa Stolarski / Naomi Archer Anthony Papa Joe Allen Harry Browne Ron Jacobs Charles R. Larson David Yearsley Poets' Basement Website of the Weekend
|
The Danger of Silence and UnderstatementRush Limbaugh and the NFLBy D. K. WILSON Now that it's safe for ESPN to discuss Rush Limbaugh at length, we know Dave Checketts has dropped Limbaugh from his investment group seeking to purchase the St. Louis Rams. The fear here is that the players who spoke out against Limbaugh and NFLPA chief DeMaurice Smith will cease being vigilant in ensuring that people who would be detrimental to the NFL are kept from inclusion in the league. Though MODI (Charles Modiano) asked White NFL players where their voices are, there was no thought here of a White NFL player speaking out against Rush Limbaugh. In a perfect world, or even a world where some of the denizens of America are conscious of the environment in which they live and work, the question is viable. But, in reality? Not on your life. There is no hope for a scenario to arise in which White athletes voices will be heard on an issue like that of Limbaugh-Rams. For these athletes to speak, they must be provided a platform to do so. Other than the few Black players who did speak via the New York Daily News, who, were the other Black NFL players who voiced their feelings about Rush Limbaugh? Exactly. None. It's not as if the statements made by Mathias Kiwanuka and Bart Scott were prefaced by, "In a letter sent by..." or "In an unsolicited email from..." Writers asked the players the questions, the players responded. Period.
In the same commentary, Climers also mentioned that Titans running back LenDale White, who is Black, said he would say "Nay" to Limbaugh's inclusion in the ranks of the NFL. There is a basic fallacy in asking about White athletes and why they did not speak about Rush Limbaugh relative to the purchase of the St. Louis Rams. That fallacy first lies in the thought that there is some real reason they should feel compelled to speak in the first place and second, even if a White NFL football player felt a want to speak publicly without first being queried by a reporter, he would first be compelled to think of the consequences for his act. Each professional athlete in team or individual sports, exists as a one-person corporation - a corporation in the truest sense of the word as its present meaning suggests. One act of consciousness might cost an NFL player, not only endorsements while he has an on-field career, but might cost him and his family millions after his time on the field is done. And after all that is considered, there is the question of what it takes for a person to speak out on such a topic. For someone, anyone -athletes and writers alike - to make an accurate, fully-realized and contextualized statement about Rush Limbaugh, it takes more than a pithy or snarky sentence or paragraph, followed by the equivalent of, "moving right along in the world of sports...:" It takes something other than the following examples from these writers who did comment on the Limbaugh-Rams issue:
Each of the writers, or in the case of Kevin Blackistone, columnist and regular television show guest who mentioned Limbaugh's political leanings, either went easy on, or incorrectly labelled the virulent racist. Others averred that Limbaugh's inclusion into the NFL politicizes sports. Still others claimed he is nothing more than an "egomaniac" or "blowhard." Finally, one columnist defended the NFL's horrific racial practices: "The NFL isn't perfect on the issues of ethnicity but it tries." Like how the NFL took 30 years after the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to acknowledge that they even had a problem with 32 White owners hiring Black head coaches, the NFL is trying. As in the discrepancy between the type of and length of suspensions handed out by Roger Goodell to White and Black NFL players, the NFL is trying. * * * While the altruistic whim - White to Black altruism - of thinking White athletes can he held to the flame is laudable, it is based in the allegedly higher-minded search for that thing called "utopia." The concept of utopia is part and parcel of why we continue exist in the racial conditions we do. In essence, when Black people mimic the White search for utopia they-we can do no greater injustice to ourselves and because we will, at some point, interact with other Black people, to each other - which inevitably has a rippling effect that will someday reach the edges of the Black Diaspora. After all, when you pursue uo topos, or, "no place," you will get uo prayma, or, nothing - or a thing so malleable and easily manipulated by those who hold power that the result is a humanity that resembles rabbits chasing carrots on sticks rather than thinking and humane humans. And utopia is the perfect "no thing" to urge people to embark on a search for, when what they really want is to be syn topos, or, "some place." Meantime, no "progressive" or "liberal" sports writer or columnist even recognized that the true star of the effort to keep Limbaugh out of the NFL show was NFL Player's Association chief, DeMaurice Smith. In an email to the union’s executive committee addressing Limbaugh’s bid to own the Rams, Smith said:
Smith's statement was subtle but pointed. He spoke to the higher values of American and Americans that are, ideally, informed by the national morality established by the men who derived the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. In doing so, Smith summed up the essence of the best side of the image the owners of National Football League seek to extol, defended every Black player in the NFL, massaged the owner's egos on the subject of racism, and removed the specter of the player's "thug image" the sports media so loves to use to generate readership and website hits. And DeMaurice Smith never mentioned Rush Limbaugh's name. Just as no mainstream sports writer, other than CBSSports.com columnist Ray Ratto, mentioned DeMaurice Smith's name. But that's fine. The question is, what happened to all the other journalists? Bryan Burwell and Jason Whitlock are in Missouri, so they are bound by their proximity to the Rams to write something about Limbaugh's bid to purchase the Rams issue. Other columnists have local and national platforms on which they could have made bold pronouncements about Limbaugh, race and sports, race and America. Instead, for all but Whitlock, these writers chose to stir the pot, then go meekly into the night. Sure, they gave the appearance of following in the great tradition of journalism to move local and national conversation in a way that might push America's citizens toward a new paradigm of thought, as evidenced by Media Matters' aggregation of quotes from sports journalists around the country. But the statements made were little more than a simulacra of a real effort to stimulate talk in the general populace. Yet Jason Whitlock chose his national forum as a FoxSports.com columnist, to air his distaste for the neo-fascist Limbaugh. Though Whitlock, when tackling issues dealing with race and sports, can be confounding - maddening, in fact - his goal is to generate the big idea, make the big statement, no matter the side of an issue he chooses. And, unlike the vast majority of his manistream peers, on the issue of Limbaugh, Whitlock dared to err on the side of greatness. In declaring Limbaugh's bid to be part of Dave Checkett's group of investors vying to own the St. Louis Rams a publicity stunt, Fox Sports and Kansas City Star columnist pulled back the covers on Limbaugh's serial media whore personality. It was a cue for other sports writers to follow and complete the picture of the radio show host and de facto leader of the neo-fascist, anti-gay rights (but often closet homosexual), racist, misogynist, xenophobic, and jingoist sect of the Republican Party. It is believed here that Limbaugh was initially serious in his want to be a part of the NFL owner's fraternity, as the vast majority of NFL franchise ownership shares Limbaugh's far-right political stances. However, at the first sign of what would be a growing, public anti-Limbaugh sentiment, the media whore in Limbaugh took over. The media personality's throne has been recently challenged primarily by Fox News resident agent provocateur, Glenn Beck. When Beck's visage, tongue poking in his singular and spooky combination childish humor and churlish meanness, adorned the cover of Time magazine, Limbaugh had to comprehend the threat that Rupert Murdoch favorite American television pet - Beck - posed to Limbaugh's place as preeminent American anti-icon, icon. And by stating that his publicly-announced removal from the Checketts group by Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay and Goodell was no less than a battle for ideological primacy in the United States (but blaming that removal on every Black bogeyman from Sharpton to President Obama), Limbaugh once again placed himself - as only a White man can - at the center of all present political firestorms. Think Limbaugh was "divisive" before this incident? Think again. Nothing compares to his current, and it can be said with certainty, the near future race-dividing verbiage he has already and will spew. In the mid-to-late 20th century America has witnessed a military and intelligence organizations coup d'etat through the assassination of John F. Kennedy, and ideological coup d'etat through the October Surprise, the Iran-Contra drugging of America, and the establishment of an internment camp for U.S. citizens mindset as spawned by Oliver North's brazen "Rex 84." Sports journalists could have acted as catalysts for political writers to continue to run with the conversation they began, placing Limbaugh's ownership effort in the aforementioned, and additional contexts. But for his efforts, editors at FoxSports.com removed Whitlock's column from its website. It would be easy to tell Whitlock to eat crow, as he has stated for anyone and all to hear that he is of such stature in the world of sports journalism that he can write whatever he chooses without fear of reprisal. But in the case of this particular column and its subject matter, there is no time for turning on Whitlock. Though Fox can do whatever it wishes as far as maintaining control over the content it disseminates, Whitlock's column had to viewed by an, or many editors, before it was posted to the FoxSports.com website. That the column never should have seen the light of the Internet is an easy call. The posting and subsequent removal of Whitlock's commentary was a purposeful show of power by Fox and a shot across the bow at every sports writer, mainstream or otherwise, in America. And as proof that the Fourth Column is a thing of the past or is little more than a quaint concept based solely in a utopia, instead of rising to his defense and facing down Fox Sports for its censorship of Whitlock, sports writers and columnists fell silent on the issue. We are, today for better or worse, a majority the native sons and daughters of America. It is time we began to seek, find, internalize the values that are common to us all. And we need to begin to shift the conversation in this country away from Rush Limbaugh or from our largely corporate-sponsored government. We need to form the foundation for a counter coup d'etat - a citizen's coup. One that results in each of us having Some Place and value in and to American society. And we need to begin now. D. K. Wilson writes for Sports On My Mind. He can be reached at: mesoanarchy@gmail.com
|
Now Available from CounterPunch Books! Yellowstone Drift:
"Powerful and shocking .. Waiting for
Lightning
|